Can I ask a question, how bad do your ratings have to suck to allow your tv network to replay a
Football game from August almost nightly?
I mean if people were actually watching the station you’d want to cater to their interests/desires, you’d want to provide new and interesting content, right?
But the sheer fact that your can basically “$hitcan” any logical programming choices to show a football replay that no one is watching, no one’s watching a game everyone knows the outcome of, that happened 4 months ago, that’s basically been on repeat loop for the past week or whatever.
By doing this, isn’t that network basically admitting that no one watches it, so they can do the replay nightly?
Reminds me of the Bob Uecker line in Major League “No one’s listening anyway”
Imho, the fact that you as a network can do this proves there’s likely no audience.
Just my 2 cents, as always I could be wrong
Replies to: Can I ask a question, how bad do your ratings have to suck to allow your tv network to replay a
The ACC is pushing the "Miami should be ahead of ND" narrative. It's what a conference should do
Agree with the narrative or not, the ACC network is actively promoting the case of one of it's members. I can understand that. If you don't like it, ignore it. I'm sure most fans are.
Yep. They will lobby for Miami. (Our deal with the ACC doesn't cover this.)
(no message)
Good reason to dump the ACC like the hot garbage it is.
(no message)
ACC, SEC and BIG networks are pretty good, but there's not a lot on this week for some reason.
So, I don't think they are pre-empting scheduled athletic events. That said, what advertiser in their right mind would pay for that?
We live in a society of media propaganda. It's a tool to shape the narrative that you want
regardless of what the truth is.
Consent Management