according to Jeff Sagarin's analysis and this sounds about right. Which means on a neutral field ND and Miami theoretically would be a toss up. Therefore, you have to use other metrics. Or am I just being a Notre Dame homer?
The conference had plenty of time to fix the problem and did squat. Surely they could have argued that the tiebreakers in place were antiquated and needed to be adjusted for the 12 team CFP, but no
You think ND would've let Miami's ends reek havoc if they had film on them? Even with respect to their own team, coaches think they've determined their best lineups, but they don't know until they play games. Have you heard much from the head-to-headers about the previously frequent truth that teams make their biggest leap between games 1 and 2? I haven't either.
The Committee is supposedly not to discourage teams from scheduling hard opponents at the beginning of the season, and now the claim is that this game should be decisive in determining which is the better team months later? If ND knew that, you think the coaches would have had such a cautious game plan?
This is nothing but a retrospective re-engineering of the significance of the game.
This bullshit keeps getting deeper.
We lost. BYU has lost and hopefully ‘Bama will lose and we’re in. Stop with the inane bullshit.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
but we're ALL IN on H2H when it didn't favor ND.
Can you give examples of the opposite?
(no message)
Consent Management