Most people thought Miami's head to head advantage put them over ND, and Alabama was going to get in no matter what. The criticism that ND only beat one good team is fair.
ND needs to look in the mirror and realize that they need to schedule better. In the 1990's the schedule was too difficult, and now it is too weak.
And those losses should be measured against the other team's (ND's)losses. Which were better?
Obviously losses to SMU and Louisville are better than to two top12 teams in Tecas A&M and Miami right?
Head to head is a tie breaker not an initial determiner. Otherwise Florida St. would be ahead of Alabama.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
(no message)
Can see why blowing fish is your day job...
(no message)
How did the CFP justify the SOS for JMU and Tulane?
Link: https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other
(no message)
2 teams with SOS in the 70s. Completely inane.
Consent Management