(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Worst case scenario it is a 15 yard penalty taking the ball to the 20 yard line. No sure thing.
Yes they both have a right to the ball, but pulling down a player is NOT going for the ball.
I do agree that another play is far from a sure thing for Ole Miss. At best a 50 % chance.
I am not convinced of a hold on the Beck TD. I saw a wrap, but not sure there was a pull like the Hinish tackle against A&M.
(no message)
Defender has ZERO right to have his hands on the WR manipulating his position for 15 yards with the ball in the air.
I don't really care about it not being called because fuck the SEC, but that was 100% DPI.
Two guys simultaneously shoving each other for position. Either call it on both or call it on neither.
From SI:
"Mutual combat" in football is typically a term used to describe a receiver and defensive back being "mutually" as physical with one another on a play, meaning no penalty would be called despite that physicality.
With the receiver and defensive back competing for the ball, officials sometimes leave potential pass interference as a no-call because of how entangled both players are in the interaction. If one player is blatantly interfering, that changes things, but "mutual combat" is more about reciprocal hand-fighting reflected on both players.
We'll agree to disagree.
same with drives to the basket, last seconds in hoops....players get mauled and refs swallow whistle.
PI, holding in line play, travelling and palming in hoops....dumbed down.
Consent Management