On Hunter's laptop, it's important to root out corruption, but in the grand scheme of things what is more relevant...
- determining whether or not Hunter was selling access to Joe?
- the fact that DHS and the FBI colluded with social media during the election to label any posts about the laptop as misinformation?
The former is run-of-the-mill corruption, the latter is election tampering and unconstitutional. I wonder if the GOP's focus on the former is because they see an opportunity to leverage the latter in the same way the Dems have. I hope not.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).