Not so interesting is, you R's here didn't condemn his tweet. And Trump didn't condemn his own tweet
- he said he didn't mean to he just meant he wanted to right the wrong done to him.
But then, he did try to circumvent the constitution prior to 1/6 and on 1/6. So, what does his newest
claim mean?
That you didn't condemn or even challenge his tweet means, you accept the path of setting aside the
constitution for your goals.
But then, he did try to circumvent the constitution prior to 1/6 and on 1/6. So, what does his newest
claim mean?
That you didn't condemn or even challenge his tweet means, you accept the path of setting aside the
constitution for your goals.
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
and Jane, she is a clerk