UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

I did not see the words "Nuclear Power" in your response, nor did you consider how Renewables can be used in consort with Nuclear Reactors to provide assured power 24/7 without exorbitant storage costs.

I've posted comments and links on NP several times...especially wrt the newest designs that already have funding and NRC approval for construction, and will be producing power starting in 2028...if you haven't read them, do a search under my board name and perhaps you'll fill your brain with sufficient information to make a better decision....in the meantime, take a look at the attached link from MIT...

You also refuse to let into your brain the fact that 193 countries and the EU have all accepted the Paris Agreement...if there were no palpable problem with Fossil Fuels affecting humanity's ability to deal with Climate Change it would be lunacy for all those countries to burden themselves with such a challenging task...add to that, you also have refused to acknowledge our most reliable source on Fossil Fuel Resources (EIA) which states that the U.S. has only FIVE YEARS of Proven Oil Reserves remaining if we stopped importing, given our current consumption rate....btw, BP (British Petroleum) pegs the World's remaining Proven Reserves at 47 years...and even if you suddenly doubled that figure overnight, we have little time to shift to other resources.

In short, the 'Morons' are those who won't even try to understand what's going on about them, and fail to "Look Up".

I encourage you to respond...I'm prepared...are you?


Link: https://energy.mit.edu/news/keeping-the-balance-how-flexible-nuclear-operation-can-help-add-more-wind-and-solar-to-the-grid/