Otherwise, your beef with the Government communicating with Twitter is, as Raskin explained, of no consequence.
See attached thread. You and jakers and others have been worked up over nothing.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=113731
Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law.
Replies to: "Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law."
- RepubliQans should use caution from moving forward with anymore show hearings - Quest4twelve - 6:27am 2/9/23
(35) [View All]
- All Republicans are scum. There is no logic only hate in their actions. - NocalIrish - 7:37pm 2/9/23
- It was indeed embarrassing for those exiled, ex-Twitter scumbags. [NT] - jakers - 12:32pm 2/9/23
- Did somebody mention "Show Hearings"? [NT]
[IMAGE]
- BaronVonZemo - 10:04am 2/9/23
- What an assclown he is. [NT] - fredyo - 10:42am 2/9/23
- Raskin echoed my sentiments re private entity v state action, beginning at 1:40 on counter. - conorlarkin - 9:02am 2/9/23
- This is 2 apologies you owe me. Nowhere did I state that it was a 1A issue. - jakers - 9:42am 2/9/23
- You have couched it as government interference with elections and discourse re elections, correct? [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:37am 2/9/23
- Just stop lying and own that you were wrong. Apologize. Have some character. - jakers - 12:30pm 2/9/23
- Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so. - conorlarkin - 1:43pm 2/9/23
- Jesus Christ, you are a lying weasel. We get it, you're surrendering and trying to retreat. - jakers - 4:26pm 2/9/23
- No. You can have a discussion about govt involvement in enforcement of social media policy - jabbadoody5 - 1:50pm 2/9/23
- I see. The GOP led house wants Congress to be a philosophy class? Very cool. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 2:48pm 2/9/23
- This really isn't that complicated. - jabbadoody5 - 3:14pm 2/9/23
- He's trying to make this "debate" go away. This is how he surrenders. [NT] - jakers - 4:27pm 2/9/23
- This really isn't that complicated. - jabbadoody5 - 3:14pm 2/9/23
- I see. The GOP led house wants Congress to be a philosophy class? Very cool. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 2:48pm 2/9/23
- Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so. - conorlarkin - 1:43pm 2/9/23
- You're pivoting. - jabbadoody5 - 10:57am 2/9/23
- ... meaning your beef is a First Amendment beef. [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 10:41am 2/9/23
- Just stop lying and own that you were wrong. Apologize. Have some character. - jakers - 12:30pm 2/9/23
- You have couched it as government interference with elections and discourse re elections, correct? [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:37am 2/9/23
- Don't put words in my mouth. - jabbadoody5 - 9:14am 2/9/23
- Read your own words. [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- And this thread .... [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- Conor, where did I specifically state that I had an issue with Twitter? - jabbadoody5 - 9:40am 2/9/23
- Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:22am 2/9/23
- I would like to know why. - jabbadoody5 - 10:38am 2/9/23
- Without a breach of federal law or a constitutional right, there is no relief. - conorlarkin - 10:51am 2/9/23
- Exactly. And don't you think it's prudent that the nature of those interactions be understood? - jabbadoody5 - 10:59am 2/9/23
- The GOP led House can investigate whatever they wish. They have the majority. - conorlarkin - 12:40pm 2/9/23
- You're putting words in my mouth again. - jabbadoody5 - 12:59pm 2/9/23
- The GOP led House can investigate whatever they wish. They have the majority. - conorlarkin - 12:40pm 2/9/23
- Exactly. And don't you think it's prudent that the nature of those interactions be understood? - jabbadoody5 - 10:59am 2/9/23
- Without a breach of federal law or a constitutional right, there is no relief. - conorlarkin - 10:51am 2/9/23
- Still waiting. Coward. [NT] - jakers - 10:23am 2/9/23
- I would like to know why. - jabbadoody5 - 10:38am 2/9/23
- Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:22am 2/9/23
- Conor, where did I specifically state that I had an issue with Twitter? - jabbadoody5 - 9:40am 2/9/23
- And this thread .... [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- Read your own words. [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- This is 2 apologies you owe me. Nowhere did I state that it was a 1A issue. - jakers - 9:42am 2/9/23
- What was embarrassing about it? [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 8:34am 2/9/23
- So was the SOTU. Clearly their rudderless shit slinging and baseless lies are not working [NT]
- Jerseymick - 7:36am 2/9/23
- All Republicans are scum. MAGAT's are inbred morons. - NocalIrish - 7:34pm 2/9/23
- Nice try…SOTU is routine tradition. Show hearings where the GQP get embarrassed are not. [NT]
- Quest4twelve - 7:39am 2/9/23
- I'm saying GQP got owned by Dark Brandon. [NT] - Jerseymick - 10:00am 2/9/23
- Corn Pop was a baaaad dude! LOL. Mr 10% [NT] - ELP - 8:23am 2/9/23
- LOL - Iggle - 8:18am 2/9/23
- It’s a marathon not a sprint. - Curly1918 - 7:06am 2/9/23