'The act most controversially and most notably prohibits public schools from having "classroom discussion"[a] or giving "classroom instruction"[b] about sexual orientation or gender identity from kindergarten through to third grade."
That's the entire gist of the bill. Links to misconstrued opinions don't answer the question at all. I'm looking for a specific piece of the bill that discriminates against anyone.
Here are two scenarios that are perfectly acceptable.
3rd grader: Who is in the picture on you desk?
Mr. Teacher. That's my husband.
3rd grader: Men can't have husbands.
Mr Teacher: I have a husband. You should talk with your parents about that later. We are doing math now.
4th grader: Who is in the picture on you desk?
Mr. Teacher. That's my husband.
4th grader: Men can't have husbands.
Mr Teacher (speaking to the class): Men can have husbands. Women can have wives. That's called being gay. Put down your math books so I can indoctrinate you into gender ideology.
The first scenario is acceptable and is not on anyway discriminatory. The second scenario, while wildly inappropriate, is acceptable under the bill.
This is a bill that gives parents of K-3 children the right to consent to what is being taught in a publicly funded classroom. Are you anti-consent? Are you pro-parental discrimination? Do you see that it's ridiculous to call this bill an antidiscrimanation bill for parents as it is to say it's discriminatory against trans people? Frankly, the fact that this bill has to exist is ridiculous.
I ask again, what exactly is in this bill that is discriminatory? If you think it's too vague and needs to be better defined, which is really the only criticism of the bill in the second article, fine. But what is discriminatory about it?