Not much interpretation required, Frank.

MAS 22813 posts Original UHND Member

Posted 3:29 pm on Jun 16, 2021

This would be like me arguing that your conclusions about Trump's "big talk" required third-party verification rather than them being obvious examples of just that.

Replies 38

Not much interpretation required, Frank. MAS 3:29pm · 6/16/21
- Of course not, you just argue it by assertion. Frank L 3:30pm · 6/16/21
  - He wasn't with it. MAS 3:33pm · 6/16/21
    - Whenever you start the Franklin nonsense, I know I hit a nerve. Frank L 3:36pm · 6/16/21
      - Franklin, I'm going to need you to own your vote. MAS 3:40pm · 6/16/21
        
        As we again shuffle off topic to salve our butt hurt ego. Frank L 3:44pm · 6/16/21
        
        Franklin, I own my vote. Now you need to own your vote. MAS 3:51pm · 6/16/21
        
        Yes, oh argument by assertion king. Get back to me when the sky has fallen in and we can talk. Frank L 3:58pm · 6/16/21
        
        Franklin, you assured us every day for four years that the sky was to fall the next day. MAS 4:09pm · 6/16/21
        
        I did? Use that amazing memory and tell me when? More BS. Frank L 4:15pm · 6/16/21
        Continue 2 replies

View Full Conversation

Locked — no new repliesNot much interpretation required, Frank.

Replies 38

Not much interpretation required, Frank.