The Court's ruling is not based on logic. It's a legal interpretation relying on selected precedents

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

The Court's ruling is not based on logic. It's a legal interpretation relying on selected precedents

Author: Curly1918 (15198 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 2:54 pm on Dec 20, 2023

View All

This is actually how the legal system words. Law is not math. Legal opinions are a bit like an Escher sketch.

SCOTUS might rule to the contrary... but it's decision would be formulated in the same fashion.

Link: https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=o258LIB%2b&id=C9B76809EB5D7624CD8C432225FECA3999A441D5&thid=OIP.o258LIB-Omzr2ySe7MktjwHaHR&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fi.pinimg.com%2foriginals%2f1d%2f96%2fce%2f1d96ce8140f7493459e25e6f8864ee77.jpg&cdnurl=h

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "The Court's ruling is not based on logic. It's a legal interpretation relying on selected precedents"

"Colorado Supreme Court gives GOP a chance to save itself" [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:05pm 12/20/23 (41) [View All]
- GOP=GOVERNMENT OF PUTIN! All Republicans are scum. Take them all off the ballot & save Democracy. - NocalIrish - 5:53pm 12/20/23
- I read the court's ruling - laughably lacking in basic logic - MarkHarman - 2:15pm 12/20/23
  - The Court's ruling is not based on logic. It's a legal interpretation relying on selected precedents [LINK] - Curly1918 - 2:54pm 12/20/23
    - Common law tradition, yes, base on precedents. Continental law tradition is based on logic. [NT] - Eli - 4:13pm 12/20/23
      - The Colorado Supreme Court Opinion is replete with citations. - Curly1918 - 8:31am 12/21/23
      - Move to Russia then, asswipe. [NT] - Frank L - 4:41pm 12/20/23
  - I think you are certainly qualfied to render that judgment [NT] - Chris94 - 2:41pm 12/20/23
  - That's interesting, Mark...give us some specific examples from the ruling that explain how you - TyroneIrish - 2:33pm 12/20/23
    - Too easy. Where to begin? - MarkHarman - 4:32pm 12/20/23
      - Here's testimony under oath that supports the involvement of DJT in the Jan. 6th insurrection... - TyroneIrish - 5:22pm 12/20/23
      - I've attached the Colorado Supreme Court ruling...you say you read it...now show us the "laughable" [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 4:57pm 12/20/23
        I already did. And what will you think when SCOTUS overturns this ruling? - MarkHarman - 11:11pm 12/20/23
    - Maybe you should try having this discussion w/ Jonathan Turley. Let us know how it went. - ELP - 3:24pm 12/20/23
      - Haven't heard from you re: Johnathan Turley, so I got this article referencing his comments about [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 5:32pm 12/20/23
        You are a piece of work. [NT] - ELP - 6:46pm 12/20/23
        Terms of endearment aside, you don't appear to like doing any work supporting your multiple claims.. - TyroneIrish - 8:09pm 12/20/23
      - Actually, my post is directed to Mark...still waiting for a reply...but since you mentioned - TyroneIrish - 4:27pm 12/20/23
- "Radical Leftist Rag says anti-Trump propaganda." [NT] - jakers - 1:33pm 12/20/23
  - Think a little more deeply about this... - TyroneIrish - 2:01pm 12/20/23
    - Why do you think "Republicans" filed suit in Colorado? Think a little more deeply. [NT] - PaND - 3:01pm 12/20/23
    - No thanks. [NT] - jakers - 2:19pm 12/20/23
      - Son of a gun...I forgot...you only make claims...defending them is not your responsibility ;-) [NT] - TyroneIrish - 2:37pm 12/20/23
        You are pedophile, a pervert, and an imbecile. - jakers - 7:43pm 12/20/23
        Clean up your posts jakers. Way over the line. [NT] - conorlarkin - 8:34pm 12/20/23
        He also posts racist shit like the “Congolese Hippo”post. Dunno why a Board that calls itself - Frank L - 10:12am 12/21/23
        
        You should be more concerned he didn't deny anything that Jakers said. [NT] - MuskyTommy - 10:10pm 12/20/23
        LOL...none of that is true...are we done now? ;-) [NT] - TyroneIrish - 12:07am 12/21/23
        
        Deny? He relishes being called those attributes, because they are true [NT] - ColeyO - 11:18pm 12/20/23
        
        Nah. And your defense of him speaks volumes. [NT] - jakers - 9:34pm 12/20/23
        
        Because this is a "Forum" for an 'Exchange' of opinions...hopefully based on facts, rationale and - TyroneIrish - 8:18pm 12/20/23
  - Frum is no leftist...and he is making the case for your boy, or for Nikki [NT] - Chris94 - 1:56pm 12/20/23
    - Interesting' bio' on David Frum...definitely not a leftist...but certainly not a MAGA, either... [NT] [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 2:24pm 12/20/23
- That's. Dead on arrival at US Supreme Court, no use discussing [NT] - cubsfanin16 - 12:54pm 12/20/23
  - There's a non-zero chance that you're wrong on that, so would you change your mind - TyroneIrish - 1:16pm 12/20/23
    - No, in that case they would obviously think that Biden had gotten to the SCOTUS [NT] - Chris94 - 1:53pm 12/20/23
      - Of course they would...but what's your take on the theory that the GOP feels the need to rid itself - TyroneIrish - 2:12pm 12/20/23
        I said it before and will say it again, on his worst day, - cubsfanin16 - 2:51pm 12/20/23
        Many Republicans disagree with you...strongly...just ask those Federalist Society Congressional Law - TyroneIrish - 3:08pm 12/20/23
        
        I think it is an opportunity that GOP leaders should jump on - Chris94 - 2:42pm 12/20/23
        Exactly. Zero moral courage. [NT] - Frank L - 11:00am 12/21/23
        
        Not wanting to drag this out, but it's my take that the 14th Amendment vector is a conscious effort - TyroneIrish - 3:15pm 12/20/23