Activity Log in Register

You mean the judgment that he raped a woman with his fat lttle fingers? Is that gonna be irrelevant?

Chris94 39361 posts Original UHND Member

Posted 2:10 pm on Mar 20, 2024

(no message)

Replies 73

You mean the judgment that he raped a woman with his fat lttle fingers? Is that gonna be irrelevant?NT Chris94 2:10pm · 3/20/24
- Somehow it’s better if you say “sexually assaulted” or “penetrated” her with his fat disgusting Frank L 3:35pm · 3/20/24
  - It wasn't nice what he said, but he said when conversing with a friend about the social setting with THEISMANCARR 3:51pm · 3/20/24
    - DJT's reaction didn't exactly convey the impression that such acts never happened...nice try, thoughVideo TyroneIrish 6:39pm · 3/20/24
    - He didn't say that is what he COULD do. He said that is what he DOES. Chris94 4:18pm · 3/20/24
      - Exact quote from the transcript. These guys will just lie even to defend him. Frank L 4:22pm · 3/20/24
    - Oh it wasn’t “nice” wasn’t it? That’s the best you can do? You hang out with guys that brag about Frank L 3:57pm · 3/20/24
- Rape was not the issue, professor, wow some professor. It was what he said about her that he got THEISMANCARR 3:34pm · 3/20/24
  - Her story reeks of a fabricationNT cubsfanin16 6:09pm · 3/20/24
    - Along with the other 20+ victims over many years. All just liars.NT Frank L 6:48pm · 3/20/24
  - Sexual assault is definitely the issue when he lied about not doing it and called her a liar for Frank L 3:37pm · 3/20/24
    - Yes there were so many witnesses and so much evidence. Or none of either. Sham trial.NT PaND 3:42pm · 3/20/24
    - Did he drag her into the dressing room, how the hell does that happen? Did she yell at the time? How THEISMANCARR 3:40pm · 3/20/24
      - He followed her in. And she explained why she didn’t scream multiple times under cross exam. Frank L 3:47pm · 3/20/24
      - There were no witnesses, there was no evidence. It's called a kangaroo court.NT PaND 3:43pm · 3/20/24
- Why do you lie?NTLink Hensou 2:22pm · 3/20/24
  - "Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll"Link TyroneIrish 2:41pm · 3/20/24
    - But, but she wasn’t his type. Even though when he saw her in a much younger photo, he thought she Frank L 4:31pm · 3/20/24
    - Stupid, did not happen.NT PaND 2:54pm · 3/20/24
    - Another WaPo shit-for-brains link lie. BTW, the FBI didn't try the case.NTLink Hensou 2:49pm · 3/20/24
      - I'm just repeating the judge's EXACT WORDS...Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll...that's a FACT.NT TyroneIrish 4:51pm · 3/20/24
        
        Another silly lie.NT Hensou 5:06pm · 3/20/24
        
        Your post is silly...the Judge's finding isn't... TyroneIrish 5:43pm · 3/20/24
        
        You did not read my link. Legally you are incorrect. According to NY law at that time.NT Hensou 6:29pm · 3/20/24
        
        Once again...it's not ME...read what the Judge said...Donald Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll...andLink TyroneIrish 6:45pm · 3/20/24
        
        You lie once again. The FBI definition was not used in this case.NT Hensou 7:35pm · 3/20/24
        Continue 6 replies
      - He raped her - and you know she was not the only one. He is a lifelong rapist.Link Chris94 3:13pm · 3/20/24
        
        He is a uniquely horrible person that these fools actually want to govern this nation.NT Frank L 3:39pm · 3/20/24
        
        Are you passing judgement on nothing you know about? What the hell, you as a professor should know THEISMANCARR 3:38pm · 3/20/24
        
        Your opinion means nothing in a court of law. Hensou 3:31pm · 3/20/24
- Well that never happened.NT PaND 2:11pm · 3/20/24

View Full Conversation