...for an important part of it.
"...while allowing for Title IX to make sure girls and women have “fairness, opportunity, and safety.”
While the issue of gender confusion is a complicated one...fairness in competition is not.
You read what I posted above and what fairness would demand. Allowing biological men to compete now (and until the parameters I've already laid out for you are met) is patently unfair and demonstrably and visibly wrong. Yet common sense is silenced in a post-Floyd world...with respect to this issue...under some bizarre new ethos.
(Separately...de Varona is a product of Southern California and the broadcasting and entertainment community.. While an ultra-elite FEMALE athlete, she competed in two Olympics as a teenager and retired in 1964 at the ripe old age of 17. She then immediately began a career in LA in broadcasting and entertainment for 50 years+. Her sister is an actress and director. She has a long history as an activist for women in sports but was out of competition long before anyone would ever dream of letting a biological man compete in her sport. As a young teenager, the only one who could routinely beat her in her sport would have been a biological male. Had she experienced that and had it impacted her Olympic dreams...I would give her position more weight. As it is though, when properly weighting for fairness to women (per de Varona), allowing biological men to compete against them is not "complicated"...except as deliberately misapplied by you).
Per usual, have grown tired of repeating myself to someone who consciously and purposefully pretends to misunderstand. (Yet another consistent tactic from your playbook.)