I asked for evidence. Why do you avoid every single question I ask in both of the threads? Because you have no evidence for this assertion and the science does not support this article of faith you hold. It makes you and Chris uncomfortable to even think about the alternative that you are left with name-calling and ad hominem attacks. It's truly all you have. You won't answer a single question I ask of you. I'll return in four days from the cabin, and you will not have answered a single thing. You know you can't and you know you can't enter into a debate where you debate honestly and avoid fallacies. It ain't in you.
Again, a hypothesis precedes testing. A hypothesis is formed based upon established facts and logical thinking. I've given you the facts on genetic influence upon impulsivity. I explained, in depth, why a plausible hypothesis is that there may be a higher percentage of impulsive individuals within different groups. You then either lie or simply don't understand the difference between that hypothesis and the ridiculously stupid idea that there is a "black gene," which predisposes all black people to impulsivity. Iggle understands this. Why can't you? Perhaps if you spent less time recalling your freshman classmates and more time learning how to formulate logical thoughts, you might do better at this whole thing.
Tell you what: you think good thoughts of me and I'll think good thoughts of you while I'm incommunicado (the old lady really wants me to ditch all devices over these days), and cut your UHND OF time in half. My hypothesis...my hypothesis is that all of these things combined will make for a happier Frank, and, in the end, don't all of us here want a happier Frank? It's July, baby! Get outside like me! Ride a bike. Go for a hike. Put a cutout Trump face on a caged dove and then shoot it! Have fun, for crying out loud!