I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but

Author: Cole (16190 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 9:34 am on Sep 5, 2024

View All

we later learn it did nothing.

Replies to: "I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but"

Not sure why MAS...being a teacher...hasn't posted about the latest mass shooting in Georgia... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 11:06pm 9/4/24 (29) [View All]
- I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but - Cole - 9:34am 9/5/24
  - Of course when they do something, they are violating someone’s rights for political reasons. [NT] - Frank L - 11:10am 9/5/24
  - You always need some distractions ready to go [NT] - holybull101 - 9:59am 9/5/24
  - All you have to do, Cole, is read the article...it appears "due process" was involved...unlike in - TyroneIrish - 9:58am 9/5/24
- And then she can explain why she doesn’t want police officers in schools [NT] - WoodstockIrish - 9:18am 9/5/24
- Acceptable casualties. Just more martyrs to the glorious second amendment. - Chris94 - 8:58am 9/5/24
  - Feel free to propose a workable solution to disarm civilians. - NedoftheHill - 11:14am 9/5/24
    - No need to disarm them. Target the ammo. - Chris94 - 11:42am 9/5/24
      - Yeah, that's working out great in Illinois. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 12:54pm 9/5/24
      - After ammo ban, are the deaths of innocent civilians by criminals "acceptable casualties" to you? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
        Never said there should be a ban - Chris94 - 1:16pm 9/5/24
        So, just make it expensive for the poor, but allow the rich to pay the tax? What types of ammo? - NedoftheHill - 1:24pm 9/5/24
        Expensive for everyone. A massive federal tax. - Chris94 - 1:27pm 9/5/24
        Yes, people who are determined to commit mass murder are going to decide it's just too expensive. - iairishcheeks - 2:25pm 9/5/24
        
        Two possibilities: "Massive" means (1) effective ban; or, (2) rights are only for the rich. - NedoftheHill - 2:08pm 9/5/24
        If you're too poor to afford bulk supplies of ammo, then tough shit [NT] - Chris94 - 4:06pm 9/5/24
        How many rounds do you think come in a single box of AR ammo? - iairishcheeks - 5:00pm 9/5/24
        He doesn't know which end of a gun is the business end. But he's an expert on all things. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:45pm 9/6/24
      - Would you ban all hunting ammo?...all self-defense ammo? SCOTUS wouldn't allow that... - NedoftheHill - 12:37pm 9/5/24
        Chris, Frank didn't answer for you. Would still like to hear your opinion of a workable ammo ban. - NedoftheHill - 12:52pm 9/5/24
        
        Uhm Ginni Thomas et al have already politicized it. [NT] - Frank L - 12:39pm 9/5/24
        Not sure what you mean. Regardless, do you think a 100% ammo ban would be constitutional? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
        Where have I advocated for such a ban and it wouldn’t be constitutional. I do advocate for a binding - Frank L - 1:42pm 9/5/24
        You inserted yourself into the ban conversation, so I asked your opinion on it. We agree. Thank you. - NedoftheHill - 2:12pm 9/5/24
        Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of - Frank L - 4:36pm 9/5/24
- Assault rifles have always been illegal. - PaND - 8:35am 9/5/24
- Are black kids getting shot in urban areas “mass shootings?” - Curly1918 - 5:34am 9/5/24
- Because the 14 year old shooter is white. - conorlarkin - 4:37am 9/5/24
  - Since there have been no photos of the shooter published yet, I just assumed he was Black? - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 8:50am 9/5/24