Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of

| Register

Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of

Author: Frank L (64700 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:36 pm on Sep 5, 2024

View All

the Court and to impose ethical restrictions, both of which it has exercised in the past.

Oh, and my only insertion is that the Court has already politicized itself and it has. Didn’t say anything about bans.

This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Replies to: "Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of"

Not sure why MAS...being a teacher...hasn't posted about the latest mass shooting in Georgia... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 11:06pm 9/4/24 (29) [View All]
- I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but - Cole - 9:34am 9/5/24
  - Of course when they do something, they are violating someone’s rights for political reasons. [NT] - Frank L - 11:10am 9/5/24
  - You always need some distractions ready to go [NT] - holybull101 - 9:59am 9/5/24
  - All you have to do, Cole, is read the article...it appears "due process" was involved...unlike in - TyroneIrish - 9:58am 9/5/24
- And then she can explain why she doesn’t want police officers in schools [NT] - WoodstockIrish - 9:18am 9/5/24
- Acceptable casualties. Just more martyrs to the glorious second amendment. - Chris94 - 8:58am 9/5/24
  - Feel free to propose a workable solution to disarm civilians. - NedoftheHill - 11:14am 9/5/24
    - No need to disarm them. Target the ammo. - Chris94 - 11:42am 9/5/24
      - Yeah, that's working out great in Illinois. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 12:54pm 9/5/24
      - After ammo ban, are the deaths of innocent civilians by criminals "acceptable casualties" to you? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
        Never said there should be a ban - Chris94 - 1:16pm 9/5/24
        So, just make it expensive for the poor, but allow the rich to pay the tax? What types of ammo? - NedoftheHill - 1:24pm 9/5/24
        Expensive for everyone. A massive federal tax. - Chris94 - 1:27pm 9/5/24
        Yes, people who are determined to commit mass murder are going to decide it's just too expensive. - iairishcheeks - 2:25pm 9/5/24
        
        Two possibilities: "Massive" means (1) effective ban; or, (2) rights are only for the rich. - NedoftheHill - 2:08pm 9/5/24
        If you're too poor to afford bulk supplies of ammo, then tough shit [NT] - Chris94 - 4:06pm 9/5/24
        How many rounds do you think come in a single box of AR ammo? - iairishcheeks - 5:00pm 9/5/24
        He doesn't know which end of a gun is the business end. But he's an expert on all things. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:45pm 9/6/24
      - Would you ban all hunting ammo?...all self-defense ammo? SCOTUS wouldn't allow that... - NedoftheHill - 12:37pm 9/5/24
        Chris, Frank didn't answer for you. Would still like to hear your opinion of a workable ammo ban. - NedoftheHill - 12:52pm 9/5/24
        
        Uhm Ginni Thomas et al have already politicized it. [NT] - Frank L - 12:39pm 9/5/24
        Not sure what you mean. Regardless, do you think a 100% ammo ban would be constitutional? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
        Where have I advocated for such a ban and it wouldn’t be constitutional. I do advocate for a binding - Frank L - 1:42pm 9/5/24
        You inserted yourself into the ban conversation, so I asked your opinion on it. We agree. Thank you. - NedoftheHill - 2:12pm 9/5/24
        Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of - Frank L - 4:36pm 9/5/24
- Assault rifles have always been illegal. - PaND - 8:35am 9/5/24
- Are black kids getting shot in urban areas “mass shootings?” - Curly1918 - 5:34am 9/5/24
- Because the 14 year old shooter is white. - conorlarkin - 4:37am 9/5/24
  - Since there have been no photos of the shooter published yet, I just assumed he was Black? - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 8:50am 9/5/24