...but thanks for mentioning me, as it provides an opportunity to get the truth out...again...
>You suggest that I don't provide support for my posts, yet it wasn't too long ago that others...among them, Baron...were annoyed that I was providing "Too Much" support with my links to such reputable publications as the "New England Journal of Medicine"...the "American Psychiatric Association"...the "New York Times"...the "Washington Post"...and several other award winning media that have been trusted for many decades...as opposed to the staple of many in the MAGA world, like FOX, which had to pay $787M for knowingly publishing falsehoods about the 2020 election.
>You also claim that I don't read my own links...not sure how you reach that conclusion, but not only do I read them before posting, but I also read the links that others post before I respond to them...case in point...Baron accused me of lying about a NEJM report dealing with the efficacy of masking in Boston area schools...said it was just an opinion piece with no data...turns out, Baron failed to note the links in that scholarly report that led to voluminous data and methods which showed clear benefits to masking...even Jakers, after I led him through the posting thread between Baron and I, acknowledged it was Baron who didn't tell the truth.
>Another claim of yours is that I don't engage in substantive discussions...first off, I've repeatedly called on others to challenge me with facts and data that they believe will prove me wrong...thus far it's been 'crickets'...just name calling and deflections...even being put on "Ignore" for the most bogus of reasons (see Baron's claim).
So, I'm inviting you to pick any issue you'd like and engage with me in a substantive discussion...based on facts and data...are you up for it?