Sorry to re-litigate...again...but Ty made some false or misleading claims about Dr. Risch's research on hydroxychloroquine. When I pointed out he was wrong, he said he'd be open as to why. So here goes:
"Dr. Risch's own superiors and peers...with expertise in virology and Infectious Diseases, that Dr. R didn't have... wrote a letter, publicly refuting everything he said." Answer - They wrote the letter well before he published his extensive research paper on the topic, in which he directly and successfully rebutted their claims. To date, none of these people have responded or reacted to Risch's paper.
"My own family Infectious Disease and Pulmonary/Critical Care ('ICU') Docs advised me that HCQ was considered 'A Joke.'" Answer - Because he is relying on faulty trials for his information. I guarantee this vaunted ID doctor has no clue about all the trials Risch mentions in his paper.
"Dr. Risch did not perform any studies involving HCQ...he simply wrote an Opinion Piece...and the studies that were done were proven faulty and inconsequential, meaning that Dr. R used poor judgement in picking them." Answer - There was only ONE faulty study Risch used as evidence HCQ+ worked... initially. In his research paper, Risch acknowledged this and subsequently did not use it as a source.
Ty, you make it a habit to ask people to read your links. Well, here is the link - again - to Dr. Risch's paper. Put your ego aside and read it. And I guarantee it has information your vaunted ID doctor has zero clue about.
Link: https://earlycovidcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Evidence-Brief-Risch-v6.pdf