by congress. Obama (nor Biden) could never get even enough Democrat votes when Dems controlled both the House, the Senate, and the WH.
Obama was warned by congress that it was a fools errand to trust Iran and allow an untrustworthy UN to oversee the compliance. He was told that JCPOA should never, ever be honored beyond his administration because it would be disallowed the moment Dems were out of office.
In all previous instances where an Adm was looking out for its' country, that would have meant that the deal would not go forward. But never underestimate the Obama ego.
But with great hubris, Obama did it anyways because he was worried about having a great foreign policy legacy and he is Islamocentric in his policies - being favorable to Islam and seeing Israel's nuclear capabilities being an imbalance in the Middle East.
The foolish JCPOA presidential edict of Obama (note again that it was NEVER a treaty ratified by congress) was indeed ended as we knew the Iranians would play this to their advantage as long as they could. The got pallets of cash from Obama and unfrozen assets from previous violations. Biden unfroze more of their assets.
Now Iran seeks to assassinate former president Trump, and it has also hacked Trump's campaign and given it to Harris' campaign to help the Dems win. They foment war in the ME with aid to Hezbollah and Hamas as well as attacks on Israel.
Our enemy supports the Democrat Party strongly, and your party courts their votes as well...that should tell you something.
Untrustworthy Iran used the idiotic appeasement $ to advance their program. JCPOA was never approved
Replies to: "Untrustworthy Iran used the idiotic appeasement $ to advance their program. JCPOA was never approved"
- MAGA dumbphuckery regarding Iran and its nuke program - Quest4twelve - 1:04pm 10/1/24
(36) [View All]
- World on fire. Vegetable i The White House. What could go wrong/ [NT] - irishsmashmouth - 7:10pm 10/1/24
- Untrustworthy Iran used the idiotic appeasement $ to advance their program. JCPOA was never approved - BaronVonZemo - 4:37pm 10/1/24
- Why do you always post stupid stuff? [NT]
- jimbasil - 5:10pm 10/1/24
- Please point out where he is wrong. [NT]
- PaND - 5:47pm 10/1/24
- “ appeasement $”. That’s just a start. [NT]
- jimbasil - 10:47pm 10/1/24
- He is not wrong on that point. - PaND - 8:29am 10/2/24
- yes he is wrong on that point which makes his entire post wrong and stupid - jimbasil - 9:49am 10/2/24
- So you proved my point, thank you. [NT]
- PaND - 10:27am 10/2/24
- I proved both you and baron wrong. None of what he posted was right - jimbasil - 12:17pm 10/2/24
- You proved neither of us wrong. - PaND - 2:49pm 10/2/24
- You're an idiot [NT] - jimbasil - 11:15pm 10/2/24
- You proved neither of us wrong. - PaND - 2:49pm 10/2/24
- I proved both you and baron wrong. None of what he posted was right - jimbasil - 12:17pm 10/2/24
- So you proved my point, thank you. [NT]
- PaND - 10:27am 10/2/24
- yes he is wrong on that point which makes his entire post wrong and stupid - jimbasil - 9:49am 10/2/24
- He is not wrong on that point. - PaND - 8:29am 10/2/24
- “ appeasement $”. That’s just a start. [NT]
- jimbasil - 10:47pm 10/1/24
- This [NT] - Quest4twelve - 5:19pm 10/1/24
- Please point out where he is wrong. [NT]
- PaND - 5:47pm 10/1/24
- Why do you always post stupid stuff? [NT]
- jimbasil - 5:10pm 10/1/24
- The evidence in fact was that they were abiding by it. Unilaterally canceling it was a self - Frank L - 2:14pm 10/1/24
- I can never trust those who believe in a deity that wants his creatures murdered. - Curly1918 - 3:55pm 10/1/24
- Really? The God of the Old Testament was fine with it and in fact did it often himself. The - Frank L - 4:22pm 10/1/24
- The authors of the Old Testament used God as cover for having committed genocide - Curly1918 - 7:04pm 10/1/24
- Just them living there…hardly. [NT] - Frank L - 9:23pm 10/1/24
- The authors of the Old Testament used God as cover for having committed genocide - Curly1918 - 7:04pm 10/1/24
- Really? The God of the Old Testament was fine with it and in fact did it often himself. The - Frank L - 4:22pm 10/1/24
- Not true, but that doesn’t bother you. - PaND - 3:41pm 10/1/24
- According to the IAEA, Iran was complying with the JCPOA...just DJT doing whatever Putin wanted him [LINK]
- TyroneIrish - 2:41pm 10/1/24
- Correct. [NT] - Frank L - 2:51pm 10/1/24
- I can never trust those who believe in a deity that wants his creatures murdered. - Curly1918 - 3:55pm 10/1/24
- You want to send more pallets of cash to Iran to help them fund their terrorism? - NedoftheHill - 1:39pm 10/1/24
- Silly Ned. Why reply with lies and also demonstrate lack knowledge? - Quest4twelve - 1:47pm 10/1/24
- Heh. You argue that we should trust Iran...on today of all days...while it attacks Israel. - NedoftheHill - 2:12pm 10/1/24
- BS. The R’s would have stopped passage. Soo, if we shouldn’t have made the agreement, and they are - Frank L - 2:19pm 10/1/24
- Only two options? Go to war, or send a pallet of cash and pretend they aren't building a nuke? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:22pm 10/1/24
- Right now it is if they keep advancing toward a building a nuke. What's yer solution? [NT]
- Frank L - 2:24pm 10/1/24
- I would avoid funding their terrorism w/ pallets of cash. I would have an actual commander in chief. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:45pm 10/1/24
- Exactly correct. Frank will never admit it. [NT] - PaND - 3:43pm 10/1/24
- How about a response? Should we go to war if they are on the verge of building a nuke and won’t stop - Frank L - 2:50pm 10/1/24
- Depends. I'm president 20ish yrs ago? Probably should have been considered. - NedoftheHill - 8:09pm 10/1/24
- The real point is that by withdrawal from the agreement by the Orange idjit that decision will soon - Frank L - 9:28pm 10/1/24
- It was going to have to be made anyway. The JCPOA didn't prevent that from happening. - NedoftheHill - 9:45pm 10/1/24
- It wouldn’t have to be made anytime soon, and that regime is going to fall. - Frank L - 12:43pm 10/2/24
- It was going to have to be made anyway. The JCPOA didn't prevent that from happening. - NedoftheHill - 9:45pm 10/1/24
- The real point is that by withdrawal from the agreement by the Orange idjit that decision will soon - Frank L - 9:28pm 10/1/24
- Depends. I'm president 20ish yrs ago? Probably should have been considered. - NedoftheHill - 8:09pm 10/1/24
- I would avoid funding their terrorism w/ pallets of cash. I would have an actual commander in chief. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:45pm 10/1/24
- Right now it is if they keep advancing toward a building a nuke. What's yer solution? [NT]
- Frank L - 2:24pm 10/1/24
- Only two options? Go to war, or send a pallet of cash and pretend they aren't building a nuke? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:22pm 10/1/24
- BS. The R’s would have stopped passage. Soo, if we shouldn’t have made the agreement, and they are - Frank L - 2:19pm 10/1/24
- Says the dumbest guy on the board, and it's not even close [NT]
- ColeyO - 1:54pm 10/1/24
- He probably thinks Trump staged this entire attack by Iran. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 2:26pm 10/1/24
- Purdue guy. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:01pm 10/1/24
- Heh. You argue that we should trust Iran...on today of all days...while it attacks Israel. - NedoftheHill - 2:12pm 10/1/24
- Silly Ned. Why reply with lies and also demonstrate lack knowledge? - Quest4twelve - 1:47pm 10/1/24