As of now, the bias appears to be for djt by not allowing the WP editorial to complete a task

jimbasil 55172 posts Joined: Nov 15, 2007

Posted 10:49 pm on Oct 28, 2024

well honored. So what has he really accomplished? He loses readership and trust. Injured one of the great informative papers known globally relegating it to marginally better than the NY POST
or to any other R. Murdoch gutter gossip print.

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk

Replies 23

As of now, the bias appears to be for djt by not allowing the WP editorial to complete a task jimbasil 10:49pm · 10/28/24
- When neutrality is bias, you know your nation is fucked.NT NedoftheHill 11:19pm · 10/28/24
  - Endorsing a positive for the nation doesn't break neutrality. It's just being factual. jimbasil 11:49pm · 10/28/24
    - This is not snark, I really would like your thoughts 86domer 10:05am · 10/29/24
      - If WaPo decided shortly after the last election they will no longer endorse candidates jimbasil 10:35am · 10/29/24
        
        I think we largely agree 86domer 10:52am · 10/29/24
        
        WSJ opinion has a hard right lean for the most part. It’s news coverage though is pretty straight up Frank L 11:02am · 10/29/24
        
        Editorial board is right lean, news (I think) is pretty much down the middle 86domer 11:31am · 10/29/24
        
        WSJ can be very inconsistent. It’s like it has dual personalities.NT jimbasil 11:37am · 10/29/24
    - Let me rephrase. When you think neutrality is bias, you are a cultist and a moron.NT NedoftheHill 12:44am · 10/29/24

View Full Conversation