I believe I heard yesterday that WAPO has only endorsed D presidential nominees since 1976 (Carter) ... and again I believe that was when WAPO started endorsements. 12 in a row all D.
So, do you believe that there is a bias within the organization? If so, why nothing nefarious, different views? different interests? organizational bias? industry bias? and if not, do you see why someone who leans R sees this as less than objective/ neutral?
Replies to: "This is not snark, I really would like your thoughts"
- "The hard truth: Americans don't trust the news media". Jeff Bezos denounced his own paper. Holy Cow [LINK]
- Eli - 10:23pm 10/28/24
(23) [View All]
- Maybe the MSM should stop reporting news from a liberal Democrat point of view [NT] - MarkHarman - 12:21pm 10/29/24
- Well said. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 10:06am 10/29/24
- Thankfully social media and podcasts have evolved to fill the truth void - LanceManion - 7:07am 10/29/24
- Oh yeah, lots of truth in both. Are you effin joking? [NT]
- Frank L - 10:04am 10/29/24
- No, because what ai said is accurate. [NT] - LanceManion - 1:44pm 10/29/24
- X has EVERYONE'S "truth" now. - Curly1918 - 10:13am 10/29/24
- Xactly. [NT] - Frank L - 10:39am 10/29/24
- Oh yeah, lots of truth in both. Are you effin joking? [NT]
- Frank L - 10:04am 10/29/24
- Bezos admits the obvious: Our MSM is biased. It is in the tank for the Democratic Party. - Irishize - 3:49am 10/29/24
- Hardly. Legacy media including WSJ, Wa Po, NYT while - Frank L - 10:51am 10/29/24
- As of now, the bias appears to be for djt by not allowing the WP editorial to complete a task - jimbasil - 10:49pm 10/28/24
- When neutrality is bias, you know your nation is fucked. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 11:19pm 10/28/24
- Endorsing a positive for the nation doesn't break neutrality. It's just being factual. - jimbasil - 11:49pm 10/28/24
- This is not snark, I really would like your thoughts - 86domer - 10:05am 10/29/24
- If WaPo decided shortly after the last election they will no longer endorse candidates - jimbasil - 10:35am 10/29/24
- I think we largely agree - 86domer - 10:52am 10/29/24
- WSJ opinion has a hard right lean for the most part. It’s news coverage though is pretty straight up - Frank L - 11:02am 10/29/24
- Editorial board is right lean, news (I think) is pretty much down the middle - 86domer - 11:31am 10/29/24
- WSJ can be very inconsistent. It’s like it has dual personalities. [NT] - jimbasil - 11:37am 10/29/24
- Editorial board is right lean, news (I think) is pretty much down the middle - 86domer - 11:31am 10/29/24
- WSJ opinion has a hard right lean for the most part. It’s news coverage though is pretty straight up - Frank L - 11:02am 10/29/24
- I think we largely agree - 86domer - 10:52am 10/29/24
- If WaPo decided shortly after the last election they will no longer endorse candidates - jimbasil - 10:35am 10/29/24
- Let me rephrase. When you think neutrality is bias, you are a cultist and a moron. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 12:44am 10/29/24
- This is not snark, I really would like your thoughts - 86domer - 10:05am 10/29/24
- Endorsing a positive for the nation doesn't break neutrality. It's just being factual. - jimbasil - 11:49pm 10/28/24
- When neutrality is bias, you know your nation is fucked. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 11:19pm 10/28/24
- Good for him, and I mean that. [NT]
- MAS - 10:33pm 10/28/24
- It was a nice editorial, probably way too late. - iairishcheeks - 11:05pm 10/28/24
- The fact that WAPO lost 200k subscribers yesterday tells you, mainstream media is an echo chamber - LanceManion - 7:13am 10/29/24
- Bezos & the elite like him are afraid of losing their standing after the election. - ELP - 8:16am 10/29/24
- The fact that WAPO lost 200k subscribers yesterday tells you, mainstream media is an echo chamber - LanceManion - 7:13am 10/29/24
- It was a nice editorial, probably way too late. - iairishcheeks - 11:05pm 10/28/24