They don't care about being wrong in hindsight. In the moment, they're trying to manufacture a result.
Replies to: "As always, they were trying to steer results to their liking"
- So Trump won Iowa by 13 pts, how did the experts get it so wrong? [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 12:59pm 11/6/24
(10) [View All]
- But I was told she (the pollster) was SO well-respected". - BaronVonZemo - 2:12pm 11/6/24
- As always, they were trying to steer results to their liking - humbaba - 1:16pm 11/6/24
- for starters, they're not "experts". they're influencers. never trust them. [NT] - und67 - 1:22pm 11/6/24
- Fake polls to discourage turnout [NT]
- holybull101 - 1:07pm 11/6/24
- Then why did she pick Orange to win both in 16 and 20? [NT] - Frank L - 2:26pm 11/6/24
- The media is corrupt. You may already know that the reporter behind that poll - Cole - 1:02pm 11/6/24
- She also predicted Orange wins in 16 and 20. How does it help her reputation to publish a false - Frank L - 1:58pm 11/6/24
- The media doesn’t care about its credibility. It only cares about setting the narrative. [NT]
- Cole - 2:06pm 11/6/24
- Not a pollster with at least a past reputation for being accurate. She looks bad right now and that - Frank L - 2:25pm 11/6/24
- The media doesn’t care about its credibility. It only cares about setting the narrative. [NT]
- Cole - 2:06pm 11/6/24
- Did not know that, but I find it interesting that the media doesn't understand how credibility works - iairishcheeks - 1:55pm 11/6/24
- She also predicted Orange wins in 16 and 20. How does it help her reputation to publish a false - Frank L - 1:58pm 11/6/24