Register

You were wrong as usual on this one.

Frank L 64990 posts Joined: Sep 20, 2007

Posted 11:42 pm on Nov 15, 2024

(no message)

Replies 16

You were wrong as usual on this one.NT Frank L 11:42pm · 11/15/24
- Lol Iggle 7:25am · 11/16/24
  - Perfect response when you know you were wrong.NT Frank L 10:17am · 11/16/24
    - Impeach Garland. They interviewed the “witness” and declined to bring charges. Iggle 1:17pm · 11/16/24
      - They didn’t have enough evidence to bring trafficking charges. Having sex with an underage minor Frank L 3:21pm · 11/16/24
        
        Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor Iggle 6:03pm · 11/16/24
        
        It’s not a crime locally either you dip shit. You are one clueless mo fo. Doubt Widener would even Frank L 9:12pm · 11/16/24
        
        Somehow, this moron still doesn't understand why the DOJ wouldn't even leak about this "witness". Iggle 9:47pm · 11/16/24
        
        There have been tons of leaks about the 17 year old victim, idjit. As I said, one clueless excuse Frank L 9:53pm · 11/16/24

View Full Conversation