Lol

I

Iggle 13088 posts Joined: Sep 14, 2007

Posted 7:25 am on Nov 16, 2024

Sure sure.

Replies 16

• Lol – Iggle 7:25am · 11/16/24
  • Perfect response when you know you were wrong.NT – Frank L 10:17am · 11/16/24
    • Impeach Garland. They interviewed the “witness” and declined to bring charges. – Iggle 1:17pm · 11/16/24
      • They didn’t have enough evidence to bring trafficking charges. Having sex with an underage minor – Frank L 3:21pm · 11/16/24
        • Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor – Iggle 6:03pm · 11/16/24
          • It’s not a crime locally either you dip shit. You are one clueless mo fo. Doubt Widener would even – Frank L 9:12pm · 11/16/24
            • Somehow, this moron still doesn't understand why the DOJ wouldn't even leak about this "witness". – Iggle 9:47pm · 11/16/24
              • There have been tons of leaks about the 17 year old victim, idjit. As I said, one clueless excuse – Frank L 9:53pm · 11/16/24

View Full Conversation