Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor

Author: Iggle (12227 Posts - Joined: Sep 14, 2007)

Posted at 6:03 pm on Nov 16, 2024

View All

Temple, Dickinson, Widener, or whatever third rate school let your 2.9 ass in must be proud.

You lose, again.

Replies to: "Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor"

Yup, no evidence that Gaetz had sex with a minor. # Release the report. [NT] [LINK] - Frank L - 11:31pm 11/15/24 (13) [View All]
- Did she watch it going on and for how long, or film it too without at least fake coughing? [NT] - THEISMANCARR - 8:47am 11/16/24
  - Good question. Why don’t we get the report and find out? Oh yeah, MAGA Mike doesn’t want it released [NT] - Frank L - 10:19am 11/16/24
- The Kavanaugh smear machine is running again. If professional legal officers dont believe you, - Eli - 12:38am 11/16/24
  - Moron. It may not have been illegal, Chicom jackass. The age of consent here is 16. - Frank L - 10:16am 11/16/24
- Impeach Garland! [NT] - Iggle - 11:35pm 11/15/24
  - They will Kavanaugh every candidate they don't like. This time is worse, using a closed DOJ case. [NT] - Eli - 12:42am 11/16/24
    - You mean an open Congressional ethics investigation. [NT] - Frank L - 10:22am 11/16/24
  - You were wrong as usual on this one. [NT] - Frank L - 11:42pm 11/15/24
    - Lol - Iggle - 7:25am 11/16/24
      - Perfect response when you know you were wrong. [NT] - Frank L - 10:17am 11/16/24
        Impeach Garland. They interviewed the “witness” and declined to bring charges. - Iggle - 1:17pm 11/16/24
        They didn’t have enough evidence to bring trafficking charges. Having sex with an underage minor - Frank L - 3:21pm 11/16/24
        Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor - Iggle - 6:03pm 11/16/24