So your logic is: because we don't have a definitive answer, it was okay to suppress one possibility

iairishcheeks 30467 posts Original UHND Member

Posted 11:51 pm on Dec 26, 2024

Gotta hand it to you, Tyrone, that's some serious dedication to deluding yourself.

Replies 40

So your logic is: because we don't have a definitive answer, it was okay to suppress one possibility iairishcheeks 11:51pm · 12/26/24
- He’s a hypocrite. Look at all the things he believed without any definitive proof. He is a sheep.NT Protagonist 5:11am · 12/27/24
  - He believes 51 former national security officials even though their own letter said they MuskyTommy 10:13am · 12/27/24
    - That's right...those Intelligence experts, having hundreds of years of experience dealing with bad TyroneIrish 1:23pm · 12/27/24
      - The letter states we do not have evidence of Russia involvement. So evidence only MuskyTommy 1:40pm · 12/27/24
        
        Again, those 51 Intel Experts clearly stated it was their Opinion...and given that Russia colluded TyroneIrish 7:24pm · 12/27/24
        
        Letter said no evidence. Try againNT MuskyTommy 8:12pm · 12/27/24
- The Truth is that no one, with the possible exception of Chinese authorities, knows the origin TyroneIrish 2:08am · 12/27/24
  - BwahahahahaNTLink Frankx 10:32am · 12/27/24
    - I really enjoy Jon Stewart...too bad he doesn't have a degree in Virology ;-)NT TyroneIrish 1:25pm · 12/27/24
      - No he does not, but has common sense and does not tow the left line as you, no matterNT Frankx 2:09pm · 12/27/24
  - Jackass, this is all about holding people accountable. iairishcheeks 2:22am · 12/27/24
    - Any time you come across the missing evidence, be sure to let us all know.NT TyroneIrish 1:26pm · 12/27/24
      - The evidence that there was a coordinated effort to shut down the lab leak hypothesis? iairishcheeks 5:27pm · 12/27/24

View Full Conversation