I said I opposed aggression against all, unlike you, who opposes aggression against some.

NedoftheHill 47402 posts Joined: Jun 29, 2011

Posted 11:13 pm on Dec 30, 2024

If you don't see my answer in that sentence, then you do not understand the issues you are discussing. It is wrong to impose violent aggression upon any innocent human being, and the government should protect all innocent human beings from aggression...all. You can't say you believe the same, can you?

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies 58

I said I opposed aggression against all, unlike you, who opposes aggression against some. NedoftheHill 11:13pm · 12/30/24
- In the cases where an innocent woman is forced or coerced into a pregnancy she never wanted, it's TyroneIrish 12:54am · 12/31/24
  - It is never morally licit to victimize a second innocent person to help a first victim. NedoftheHill 1:37pm · 12/31/24
    - Thanks for re-engaging...I've attached the post just prior to you leaving the discussion, and it has Link TyroneIrish 3:00pm · 12/31/24
      - I said "human beings" not "persons." You are defining "person" so you can kill "human beings." NedoftheHill 4:52pm · 12/31/24
        
        Glad you brought up 'Biology'...a woman is not simply a "Biological Baby Making Machine" that anyone Link TyroneIrish 11:03pm · 12/31/24
        
        I respond with religious argument when you misrepresent Church Doctrine about abortion. NedoftheHill 11:48pm · 12/31/24
        
        I've researched each of your contentions and posted documentation that refutes them...if you think TyroneIrish 12:57am · 1/1/25
        
        As you know & lie about, the Catholic Church does not rely on your subtle, nuanced definition. NedoftheHill 12:03am · 1/2/25
        
        There you go again, failing to address the plight of innocent women who have been impregnated TyroneIrish 1:39am · 1/2/25
        Continue 12 replies

View Full Conversation