Very selective reading and zero understanding of tort law: California need not be solely responsible

| Register

Very selective reading and zero understanding of tort law: California need not be solely responsible

Author: Curly1918 (15592 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 3:28 pm on Jan 14, 2025

View All

to be severally liable for the damages caused by its failure to mitigate.

Plus, there have been Santa Ana winds causing wildfires much larger than this one before white folks even arrived in California.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "Very selective reading and zero understanding of tort law: California need not be solely responsible"

Time for a class action suit against California for their wildfire contributions to global warming. [LINK] - Curly1918 - 12:28pm 1/14/25 (11) [View All]
- "2 decade effort by Cali to cut their emissions wiped out by 1 fire" resulting from their green regs - BaronVonZemo - 5:13pm 1/14/25
  - Agree to a certain extent… - Domer From Hell - 10:28pm 1/14/25
- You should have read your own linked article before posting - TyroneIrish - 2:07pm 1/14/25
  - Very selective reading and zero understanding of tort law: California need not be solely responsible - Curly1918 - 3:28pm 1/14/25
    - Very selective posting by you, Curly...leaving out that significant and relevant section of the - TyroneIrish - 7:20pm 1/14/25
      - I'm not sure you understand the legal meaning of the word relevance. [LINK] - Curly1918 - 7:43pm 1/14/25
        Take a break from 'Ambulance Chasing' and outline what you think should have been done to - TyroneIrish - 11:17pm 1/14/25
        Boom. [NT] - Frank L - 11:42pm 1/14/25
  - Hilarious. - PaND - 2:28pm 1/14/25
- Fire departments and police are some of the most basic government functions. - iairishcheeks - 1:26pm 1/14/25
  - I heard their homeless budget is more than their fire fighting budget, so... - NedoftheHill - 7:41pm 1/14/25