...again assuming that it was not intra abdominal bleeding.
He had a radical stalker that all knew was looking for trouble who was disobeying orders in the running engine of a very large SUV.
He had a significant other jumping back in the car and shout, "Drive baby, drive" while he was standing right in front of her.
He had a past history of being struck and dragged by a vehicle in a similar setting with these violent radicals.
,,,,still, he had not unholstered his weapon.
The the tires spin loudly as she listens to her friend and guns it.
He has a split second to decide.
He draws his weapon and fires as per his training - 3 x as she heads at him and actually strikes his abdomen hard enough to cause bleeding within his torso (abd wall vs intrabdominal - either requires a significant hit and certainly enough to justify him to fear for his life).
The car turns after the shots.
Was she turning before the shots? Not enough to avoid him obviously.
Would she have turned that much if she were not shot? Unknown.
You libs initially denied that the agent was struck at all. You initially pretended this was an innocent as well. Neither is true, but as the facts come out, you refuse to change your politically motivated conviction that he killed her in cold blood.
As I said, TDS'ers gonna TDS. That is you.