"Does the agent of change candidate have to be a whacko?" No, of course not.
"Why can't the message of change bring forth a semi solid candidate." It could, but the process we have for selecting candidates is very imperfect. Do you not agree?
"And I guess the message is so critical it is worth supporting a total ass where words have no meaning." Words have no meaning with Hillary. That aspect is a wash between the two candidates. No difference.
"Ian no Hillary fan but there is a different in the dangers they bring to the Republic. Trump is a clear and present danger" Please elaborate.