It was you who didn't read the article, not me.

And to Mark if you are reading this:
You should either enforce your rules against jim equally, or allow me to respond in kind.
The guy inferred that I killed people below among other insults. Somehow this didn't trigger your filter.
This weak effort attack from jim simply throws out attacks with no effort to substanatiate

He's not the only one.

You have said "You don't know how many others I have deleted". True. You also pointed out that you can't read everything. True.

But, I do know what post you singled out, and what post you allowed to stand without deletion, in a thread that you locked recently with specific parts locked & unlocked.
My comment re conor that got the lock is a long, ongoing teasing that has been reciprocated back & forth in various ways for years. I'm willing to comply with that if you want to discontinue all of that kind of stuff going forward if you do it both ways.

Jim has only gotten worse because he is emboldened by your selectivity