Let's get things right - your link is the Heritage Foundation

which designates the case type not an actual conviction - the link states details of what they're being noted for. We're not sure where the info comes from
but you should note - these are stats by HF from years and years of research to find consequential voter fraud which by the nature having the ability to see them
on a few pages tells us - the variety of voter fraud across the nation is, inconsequential to the results.

Most important to note -

there is no widespread voter fraud - it's something invented for scare tactics.

Your rage is noted

I stand by my post