Activity Log in Register

That’s not what it requests. It requests an injunction against the defendants from acessessing

Frank L 64990 posts Joined: Sep 20, 2007

Posted 3:06 pm on Apr 20, 2018

0

the servers. Nowhere goes it mention the federal government being enjoined from doing so.

Replies 48

That’s not what it requests. It requests an injunction against the defendants from acessessing Frank L 3:06pm · 4/20/18
- They should have gotten that court order in 2016. Would have solved everything.NT NedoftheHill 3:08pm · 4/20/18
  - Yeah they should have anticipated the scum they were running against would use Russia Frank L 3:18pm · 4/20/18
    - I'll be moving on now, Frank. See if you can get someone else sucked in to a conversation with you. NedoftheHill 3:27pm · 4/20/18
      - I don't miss Basil either...NT iairishcheeks 5:00pm · 4/20/18
        
        Indeed.NT NedoftheHill 12:28pm · 4/21/18
        
        Slurp.NT Frank L 5:21pm · 4/20/18
        
        You're just jealous.NT iairishcheeks 5:34pm · 4/20/18
        
        Nevermind.NT Frank L 5:39pm · 4/20/18
        
        Struck a nerve, eh?NT iairishcheeks 6:40pm · 4/20/18
        
        You struck my “I don’t care about you” bone. Frank L 10:55pm · 4/20/18
        Continue 2 replies
      - Don’t go away mad Ned.....but if you can’t respond I know why you need to go away.NT Frank L 3:32pm · 4/20/18
- So sue the defendants, but prevent them from defending the lawsuit?NT Cole 3:07pm · 4/20/18
  - It is a publicity stunt. I'd be pissed if I were a judge and got this. NedoftheHill 3:12pm · 4/20/18
    - Of course you are because you are a pure partisan. Wanna bet on whether it survives a Rule 12 MotionNT Frank L 3:13pm · 4/20/18

View Full Conversation