I understand. The actual number of part-time jobs lost is in that report.

It's not 600K, It's about half of that.

It's just odd that we've always used the same numbers from this report (and they are good), but now out of the blue we get quoted a number that is not in these reports (at least I still can't find it), and is not something we talked about any of the last 18 months.

Most of all, who said it was a record? Did Cramer say that? I don't I saw that in the article.