because all you do is want to smear Trump.
Read the tweet yourself.
ADVERTISEMENT
Replies to: "Again, worthless "polling" data, not "voter" data, which is the mistake you keep making"
- Hysterical. All you do is have to wait 5 mins & the reporting gets shot to bits. Chris, feel stupid? [NT]
[LINK]
- Cole - 2:22pm 1/9/19
(39) [View All]
- You don’t have to feel it. You are it. - Frank L - 4:00pm 1/9/19
- You’ll note that he backed away from his original claim pretty fast - Chris94 - 6:06pm 1/9/19
- You didn't read the NYTimes reporting. You have your facts wrong. [NT]
- Cole - 4:28pm 1/9/19
- What facts might they be genius? [NT]
- Frank L - 4:39pm 1/9/19
- 1. Polling, not voter data. 2. Shared to please Manafort's Ukrainian friends, not Putin. But Orange - Cole - 6:20pm 1/9/19
- you refuse to learn - Chris94 - 8:18pm 1/9/19
- You are wrong so often that you should be banned. [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 7:38am 1/10/19
- I said internal polling data genius. Passed to a GRU operative. - Frank L - 8:14pm 1/9/19
- You should be embarassed. [NT]
[LINK]
- Cole - 8:26am 1/10/19
- Uhm how? Like these two weren’t Putin allies? Like he didn’t give internal campaign data to a GRU - Frank L - 11:15am 1/10/19
- You should be embarassed. [NT]
[LINK]
- Cole - 8:26am 1/10/19
- you refuse to learn - Chris94 - 8:18pm 1/9/19
- 1. Polling, not voter data. 2. Shared to please Manafort's Ukrainian friends, not Putin. But Orange - Cole - 6:20pm 1/9/19
- Cole not answering an inconvenient question? Shocking! - Chris94 - 4:32pm 1/9/19
- He’s the worst type of enabler/apologist, but fun to mess with. [NT]
- Frank L - 4:46pm 1/9/19
- You voted for a rapist's enabler. [NT]
- Cole - 6:18pm 1/9/19
- Against an actual rapist, yeah. [NT]
- Frank L - 8:15pm 1/9/19
- If he was convicted, then he must have already paid his debt to society. Otherwise, he'd be in jail. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 9:06pm 1/9/19
- You mean the one who was enabled? [NT] - Frank L - 9:32pm 1/9/19
- If he was convicted, then he must have already paid his debt to society. Otherwise, he'd be in jail. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 9:06pm 1/9/19
- Against an actual rapist, yeah. [NT]
- Frank L - 8:15pm 1/9/19
- You know why con men rarely get caught? - Rooney - 4:55pm 1/9/19
- Amen. [NT] - ND1IRISH - 8:41pm 1/9/19
- You voted for a rapist's enabler. [NT]
- Cole - 6:18pm 1/9/19
- He’s the worst type of enabler/apologist, but fun to mess with. [NT]
- Frank L - 4:46pm 1/9/19
- What facts might they be genius? [NT]
- Frank L - 4:39pm 1/9/19
- Hard as this is to believe, you do not understand what this means. - Chris94 - 2:32pm 1/9/19
- It might be something. It might not. More fun to think it might be something, though, am I right? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:41pm 1/9/19
- Mueller apparently thinks it is something - Chris94 - 2:45pm 1/9/19
- He thinks it is something that was lied about, not that the something was a crime. - NedoftheHill - 4:26pm 1/9/19
- As I keep saying we don’t know what he has or what he thinks. - Frank L - 4:44pm 1/9/19
- That's what I've been saying. We don't know. You sure do act like you know, though. - NedoftheHill - 6:40pm 1/9/19
- Really? None of that matters. - Frank L - 8:17pm 1/9/19
- I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case. - NedoftheHill - 9:10pm 1/9/19
- Then give me an innocent explanation for what they did. C’mon boy you can do it. - Frank L - 9:35pm 1/9/19
- No law has been alleged to be violated. That's a good explanation most of the time. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 10:40pm 1/9/19
- Which means you can’t. Figures. [NT] - Frank L - 8:24am 1/10/19
- No law has been alleged to be violated. That's a good explanation most of the time. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 10:40pm 1/9/19
- Then give me an innocent explanation for what they did. C’mon boy you can do it. - Frank L - 9:35pm 1/9/19
- I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case. - NedoftheHill - 9:10pm 1/9/19
- Really? None of that matters. - Frank L - 8:17pm 1/9/19
- That's what I've been saying. We don't know. You sure do act like you know, though. - NedoftheHill - 6:40pm 1/9/19
- And how exactly do you know that? - Chris94 - 4:29pm 1/9/19
- You call me out in this thread where you were just pantsed for your comments yesterday? - BaronVonZemo - 5:59pm 1/9/19
- Uh, what now? [NT] - Chris94 - 6:04pm 1/9/19
- Just reading portions of what you posted. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 4:33pm 1/9/19
- You call me out in this thread where you were just pantsed for your comments yesterday? - BaronVonZemo - 5:59pm 1/9/19
- As I keep saying we don’t know what he has or what he thinks. - Frank L - 4:44pm 1/9/19
- He thinks it is something that was lied about, not that the something was a crime. - NedoftheHill - 4:26pm 1/9/19
- Mueller apparently thinks it is something - Chris94 - 2:45pm 1/9/19
- Again, worthless "polling" data, not "voter" data, which is the mistake you keep making - Cole - 2:36pm 1/9/19
- This is like watching Clemson on Alabama in the 4th Q. Let's see if Chris gives up like Bama did. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 6:00pm 1/9/19
- Worthless? Bwahahahaha [NT] - Frank L - 4:02pm 1/9/19
- Those are the words Manafort's lawyers used - Chris94 - 2:44pm 1/9/19
- They used the word "polling." Please provide a link where they used "voter." [LINK]
- Cole - 2:47pm 1/9/19
- Miscommunication - I meant "polling" was the word his attorneys used - Chris94 - 2:55pm 1/9/19
- They used the word "polling." Please provide a link where they used "voter." [LINK]
- Cole - 2:47pm 1/9/19
- It might be something. It might not. More fun to think it might be something, though, am I right? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:41pm 1/9/19
- You don’t have to feel it. You are it. - Frank L - 4:00pm 1/9/19
Consent Management