I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case.

| Register

I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case.

Author: NedoftheHill (45347 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 9:10 pm on Jan 9, 2019

View All

First a few questions: What internal campaign information was provided?

Was the guy a GRU operative when he gave it? What was his name? Are you talking about his business partner?

What law was violated?

Make your case.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies to: "I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case."

Hysterical. All you do is have to wait 5 mins & the reporting gets shot to bits. Chris, feel stupid? [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 2:22pm 1/9/19 (39) [View All]
- You don’t have to feel it. You are it. - Frank L - 4:00pm 1/9/19
  - You’ll note that he backed away from his original claim pretty fast - Chris94 - 6:06pm 1/9/19
  - You didn't read the NYTimes reporting. You have your facts wrong. [NT] - Cole - 4:28pm 1/9/19
    - What facts might they be genius? [NT] - Frank L - 4:39pm 1/9/19
      - 1. Polling, not voter data. 2. Shared to please Manafort's Ukrainian friends, not Putin. But Orange - Cole - 6:20pm 1/9/19
        you refuse to learn - Chris94 - 8:18pm 1/9/19
        You are wrong so often that you should be banned. [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 7:38am 1/10/19
        
        I said internal polling data genius. Passed to a GRU operative. - Frank L - 8:14pm 1/9/19
        You should be embarassed. [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 8:26am 1/10/19
        Uhm how? Like these two weren’t Putin allies? Like he didn’t give internal campaign data to a GRU - Frank L - 11:15am 1/10/19
    - Cole not answering an inconvenient question? Shocking! - Chris94 - 4:32pm 1/9/19
      - He’s the worst type of enabler/apologist, but fun to mess with. [NT] - Frank L - 4:46pm 1/9/19
        You voted for a rapist's enabler. [NT] - Cole - 6:18pm 1/9/19
        Against an actual rapist, yeah. [NT] - Frank L - 8:15pm 1/9/19
        If he was convicted, then he must have already paid his debt to society. Otherwise, he'd be in jail. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:06pm 1/9/19
        You mean the one who was enabled? [NT] - Frank L - 9:32pm 1/9/19
        
        You know why con men rarely get caught? - Rooney - 4:55pm 1/9/19
        Amen. [NT] - ND1IRISH - 8:41pm 1/9/19
- Hard as this is to believe, you do not understand what this means. - Chris94 - 2:32pm 1/9/19
  - It might be something. It might not. More fun to think it might be something, though, am I right? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 2:41pm 1/9/19
    - Mueller apparently thinks it is something - Chris94 - 2:45pm 1/9/19
      - He thinks it is something that was lied about, not that the something was a crime. - NedoftheHill - 4:26pm 1/9/19
        As I keep saying we don’t know what he has or what he thinks. - Frank L - 4:44pm 1/9/19
        That's what I've been saying. We don't know. You sure do act like you know, though. - NedoftheHill - 6:40pm 1/9/19
        Really? None of that matters. - Frank L - 8:17pm 1/9/19
        I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case. - NedoftheHill - 9:10pm 1/9/19
        Then give me an innocent explanation for what they did. C’mon boy you can do it. - Frank L - 9:35pm 1/9/19
        No law has been alleged to be violated. That's a good explanation most of the time. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:40pm 1/9/19
        Which means you can’t. Figures. [NT] - Frank L - 8:24am 1/10/19
        
        And how exactly do you know that? - Chris94 - 4:29pm 1/9/19
        You call me out in this thread where you were just pantsed for your comments yesterday? - BaronVonZemo - 5:59pm 1/9/19
        Uh, what now? [NT] - Chris94 - 6:04pm 1/9/19
        
        Just reading portions of what you posted. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 4:33pm 1/9/19
  - Again, worthless "polling" data, not "voter" data, which is the mistake you keep making - Cole - 2:36pm 1/9/19
    - This is like watching Clemson on Alabama in the 4th Q. Let's see if Chris gives up like Bama did. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 6:00pm 1/9/19
    - Worthless? Bwahahahaha [NT] - Frank L - 4:02pm 1/9/19
    - Those are the words Manafort's lawyers used - Chris94 - 2:44pm 1/9/19
      - They used the word "polling." Please provide a link where they used "voter." [LINK] - Cole - 2:47pm 1/9/19
        Miscommunication - I meant "polling" was the word his attorneys used - Chris94 - 2:55pm 1/9/19