It is a false report! There is no other possible response, because if it is true, it is the end of the line.
You don't know, and I don't know. But these reporters have staked their careers on it.
We will know soon.
Replies to: "There is only one possible Trump defense for this"
- Do you who are Orange supporters here feel that he should be impeached if it is proven beyond - Frank L - 12:54pm 1/18/19
(31) [View All]
- Yes - 86domer - 6:35pm 1/18/19
- I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close - THEISMANCARR - 4:34pm 1/18/19
- Suborning perjury has nothing to do with "connections" [NT] - Chris94 - 4:57pm 1/18/19
- Said many times, just impeach him, paper tiger. A liar suddenly becomes your treasure, pathetic. [NT] - Eli - 2:56pm 1/18/19
- Yes but allegations of a known liar does not constitute proof [NT]
- CC72 - 1:36pm 1/18/19
- Of course. But according to the report there is a good deal of other evidence. [NT] - Chris94 - 1:57pm 1/18/19
- Except if he lied for Trump at the direction of Trump. [NT]
- Frank L - 1:48pm 1/18/19
- . [NT] - Frank L - 1:59pm 1/18/19
- This is now beyond opinion - Chris94 - 1:22pm 1/18/19
- Buzzfeed already debunked its own story. Why do you persist in the face of its debunking? [NT]
- Cole - 1:01pm 1/18/19
- No they didn't. Wishful thinking. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:22pm 1/18/19
- 1. An admitted fabulist reporter 2. does not quote from his sources 3. did not see the documents - Cole - 1:29pm 1/18/19
- Hopefully, your premature ejaculation is limited to your writings. [NT] - Frank L - 1:53pm 1/18/19
- There is only one possible Trump defense for this - Chris94 - 1:32pm 1/18/19
- 1. An admitted fabulist reporter 2. does not quote from his sources 3. did not see the documents - Cole - 1:29pm 1/18/19
- No they didn’t. They said they hadn’t seen the supporting evidence. - Frank L - 1:08pm 1/18/19
- Why would credible sources go to non-credible BuzzFeed[News] over NYT, WAPO, etc? [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 1:39pm 1/18/19
- I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak - Chris94 - 2:06pm 1/18/19
- Pretty easy solution to all of this, wait to see if it is corroborated or disproven. - Frank L - 1:51pm 1/18/19
- Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:25pm 1/18/19
- In the meantime, you seem happy to assume it's true. [NT]
[LINK]
- Cole - 1:54pm 1/18/19
- Wrong. Pointing out the fact that he’s an admitted liar also isn’t dispositive - Frank L - 2:02pm 1/18/19
- One of them is a fabulist who reported the Karl Rove got indicted. And, both said they saw nothing. - Cole - 1:16pm 1/18/19
- All sane Americans hope this is not an accurate story - Chris94 - 1:23pm 1/18/19
- You are smart, I give you that. Don't vouch for the story, but talk about it a lot - Cole - 1:24pm 1/18/19
- Again, merely wishful thinking [NT] - Chris94 - 1:26pm 1/18/19
- You are smart, I give you that. Don't vouch for the story, but talk about it a lot - Cole - 1:24pm 1/18/19
- Of course they are. And you believe Trumpo about the prayer rugs found at border - jimbasil - 1:20pm 1/18/19
- The Columbia Journalism Review has documented that Leopold has been “caught making stuff up” on more - Cole - 1:23pm 1/18/19
- Who is Leopold? [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:34pm 1/18/19
- Loeb’s Buddy. [NT]
- Frank L - 7:07pm 1/18/19
- Found it. Thanks. - jimbasil - 7:41am 1/19/19
- Loeb’s Buddy. [NT]
- Frank L - 7:07pm 1/18/19
- Who is Leopold? [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:34pm 1/18/19
- The Columbia Journalism Review has documented that Leopold has been “caught making stuff up” on more - Cole - 1:23pm 1/18/19
- All sane Americans hope this is not an accurate story - Chris94 - 1:23pm 1/18/19
- Why would credible sources go to non-credible BuzzFeed[News] over NYT, WAPO, etc? [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 1:39pm 1/18/19
- No they didn't. Wishful thinking. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:22pm 1/18/19