I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak

Author: Chris94 (38851 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:06 pm on Jan 18, 2019

View All

According to the journalists involved, it has been in the works for almost a year.

We shall see.

Replies to: “I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak”

Do you who are Orange supporters here feel that he should be impeached if it is proven beyond - Frank L - 5:54pm 1/18/19 (31) [View All]
- Yes - 86domer - 11:35pm 1/18/19
- I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close - THEISMANCARR - 9:34pm 1/18/19
  - Suborning perjury has nothing to do with "connections" [NT] - Chris94 - 9:57pm 1/18/19
- Said many times, just impeach him, paper tiger. A liar suddenly becomes your treasure, pathetic. [NT] - Eli - 7:56pm 1/18/19
- Yes but allegations of a known liar does not constitute proof [NT] - CC72 - 6:36pm 1/18/19
  - Of course. But according to the report there is a good deal of other evidence. [NT] - Chris94 - 6:57pm 1/18/19
  - Except if he lied for Trump at the direction of Trump. [NT] - Frank L - 6:48pm 1/18/19
    - . [NT] - Frank L - 6:59pm 1/18/19
- This is now beyond opinion - Chris94 - 6:22pm 1/18/19
- Buzzfeed already debunked its own story. Why do you persist in the face of its debunking? [NT] - Cole - 6:01pm 1/18/19
  - No they didn't. Wishful thinking. [NT] - Chris94 - 6:22pm 1/18/19
    - 1. An admitted fabulist reporter 2. does not quote from his sources 3. did not see the documents - Cole - 6:29pm 1/18/19
      - Hopefully, your premature ejaculation is limited to your writings. [NT] - Frank L - 6:53pm 1/18/19
      - There is only one possible Trump defense for this - Chris94 - 6:32pm 1/18/19
  - No they didn’t. They said they hadn’t seen the supporting evidence. - Frank L - 6:08pm 1/18/19
    - Why would credible sources go to non-credible BuzzFeed[News] over NYT, WAPO, etc? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 6:39pm 1/18/19
      - I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak - Chris94 - 7:06pm 1/18/19
      - Pretty easy solution to all of this, wait to see if it is corroborated or disproven. - Frank L - 6:51pm 1/18/19
        
        Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 7:25pm 1/18/19
        
        In the meantime, you seem happy to assume it's true. [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 6:54pm 1/18/19
        
        Wrong. Pointing out the fact that he’s an admitted liar also isn’t dispositive - Frank L - 7:02pm 1/18/19
    - One of them is a fabulist who reported the Karl Rove got indicted. And, both said they saw nothing. - Cole - 6:16pm 1/18/19
      - All sane Americans hope this is not an accurate story - Chris94 - 6:23pm 1/18/19
        
        You are smart, I give you that. Don't vouch for the story, but talk about it a lot - Cole - 6:24pm 1/18/19
        
        Again, merely wishful thinking [NT] - Chris94 - 6:26pm 1/18/19
        
        The Columbia Journalism Review used more polite words in describing the reporter's history of lying. - Cole - 6:30pm 1/18/19
      - Of course they are. And you believe Trumpo about the prayer rugs found at border - jimbasil - 6:20pm 1/18/19
        
        The Columbia Journalism Review has documented that Leopold has been “caught making stuff up” on more - Cole - 6:23pm 1/18/19
        
        Who is Leopold? [NT] - jimbasil - 7:34pm 1/18/19
        
        Loeb’s Buddy. [NT] - Frank L - 12:07am 1/19/19
        
        Found it. Thanks. - jimbasil - 12:41pm 1/19/19

Consent Management