I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close

Author: THEISMANCARR (17477 Posts - Joined: Aug 10, 2007)

Posted at 4:34 pm on Jan 18, 2019

View All

to the enemy in order to promulgate good things for the country, in my mind does not constitute a bad connection.

Replies to: "I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close"

Do you who are Orange supporters here feel that he should be impeached if it is proven beyond - Frank L - 12:54pm 1/18/19 (31) [View All]
- Yes - 86domer - 6:35pm 1/18/19
- I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close - THEISMANCARR - 4:34pm 1/18/19
  - Suborning perjury has nothing to do with "connections" [NT] - Chris94 - 4:57pm 1/18/19
- Said many times, just impeach him, paper tiger. A liar suddenly becomes your treasure, pathetic. [NT] - Eli - 2:56pm 1/18/19
- Yes but allegations of a known liar does not constitute proof [NT] - CC72 - 1:36pm 1/18/19
  - Of course. But according to the report there is a good deal of other evidence. [NT] - Chris94 - 1:57pm 1/18/19
  - Except if he lied for Trump at the direction of Trump. [NT] - Frank L - 1:48pm 1/18/19
    - . [NT] - Frank L - 1:59pm 1/18/19
- This is now beyond opinion - Chris94 - 1:22pm 1/18/19
- Buzzfeed already debunked its own story. Why do you persist in the face of its debunking? [NT] - Cole - 1:01pm 1/18/19
  - No they didn't. Wishful thinking. [NT] - Chris94 - 1:22pm 1/18/19
    - 1. An admitted fabulist reporter 2. does not quote from his sources 3. did not see the documents - Cole - 1:29pm 1/18/19
      - Hopefully, your premature ejaculation is limited to your writings. [NT] - Frank L - 1:53pm 1/18/19
      - There is only one possible Trump defense for this - Chris94 - 1:32pm 1/18/19
  - No they didn’t. They said they hadn’t seen the supporting evidence. - Frank L - 1:08pm 1/18/19
    - Why would credible sources go to non-credible BuzzFeed[News] over NYT, WAPO, etc? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 1:39pm 1/18/19
      - I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak - Chris94 - 2:06pm 1/18/19
      - Pretty easy solution to all of this, wait to see if it is corroborated or disproven. - Frank L - 1:51pm 1/18/19
        Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:25pm 1/18/19
        
        In the meantime, you seem happy to assume it's true. [NT] [LINK] - Cole - 1:54pm 1/18/19
        Wrong. Pointing out the fact that he’s an admitted liar also isn’t dispositive - Frank L - 2:02pm 1/18/19
    - One of them is a fabulist who reported the Karl Rove got indicted. And, both said they saw nothing. - Cole - 1:16pm 1/18/19
      - All sane Americans hope this is not an accurate story - Chris94 - 1:23pm 1/18/19
        You are smart, I give you that. Don't vouch for the story, but talk about it a lot - Cole - 1:24pm 1/18/19
        Again, merely wishful thinking [NT] - Chris94 - 1:26pm 1/18/19
        The Columbia Journalism Review used more polite words in describing the reporter's history of lying. - Cole - 1:30pm 1/18/19
      - Of course they are. And you believe Trumpo about the prayer rugs found at border - jimbasil - 1:20pm 1/18/19
        The Columbia Journalism Review has documented that Leopold has been “caught making stuff up” on more - Cole - 1:23pm 1/18/19
        Who is Leopold? [NT] - jimbasil - 2:34pm 1/18/19
        Loeb’s Buddy. [NT] - Frank L - 7:07pm 1/18/19
        Found it. Thanks. - jimbasil - 7:41am 1/19/19