Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

One legal problem is that the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 2:04 pm on Aug 8, 2019
View All

I think you can make a much stronger legal argument that pure hunting guns (and maybe even pure self-defense guns) are more bannable than militia style guns. There is significant overlap, to be sure. If a gun is good for a militia, it is often good for hunting, and vice versa. But the Founding Fathers weren't worried about hunting when they proposed the Bill of Rights.

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies to: "One legal problem is that the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting."

  • Yet another mass murder- not a Trump supporter this time [LINK] - CC72 - 1:08pm 8/8/19 (27) [View All]
    • I love this line of defense - Chris94 - 1:15pm 8/8/19
      • If you really loved it, you’d start a third thread about it [NT] - LehighND - 1:23pm 8/8/19
      • I'm fine with banning some of those guns, but how are you going to sell it? - MAS - 1:21pm 8/8/19
        • Those in the middle are the ones that need to be motivated. I doubt that a ban will have much - Frank L - 1:45pm 8/8/19
          • I live in an area where most homes have guns. I think you're overestimating how difficult it is... - MAS - 1:52pm 8/8/19
            • One legal problem is that the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting. - NedoftheHill - 2:04pm 8/8/19
            • We likely live in the same type of rural area. Know of no households close that don’t have weapons - Frank L - 2:03pm 8/8/19
        • I don't think you can convince people to change their minds - Chris94 - 1:30pm 8/8/19
          • Millions of gun owners aren't NRA members and probably can be moved on this issue. - MAS - 1:48pm 8/8/19
            • I am not an NRA member and no, you can not have my guns [NT] - CC72 - 1:50pm 8/8/19
              • Every other right you possess, even your 1st Amendment right, has limitations. - MAS - 1:53pm 8/8/19
                • You don’t know about the limitations that already exist, do you? - CC72 - 2:21pm 8/8/19
                  • Yes, and you're jumping to conclusions about me and my intentions. - MAS - 2:46pm 8/8/19
                    • JOE BIDEN says he wants to take my guns [NT] [LINK] - CC72 - 2:59pm 8/8/19
                    • Unfortunately you are not one of the Dem congresspersons - CC72 - 2:54pm 8/8/19
                      • Well, there's one Dem congressman to my west who has a 100% NRA rating last I checked. - MAS - 3:05pm 8/8/19
                • There are limitations already. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 1:55pm 8/8/19
                  • The people who want to take your guns don’t care about existing regulations - CC72 - 2:23pm 8/8/19
          • Pay to buy back guns in your neighborhood and destroy them - CC72 - 1:48pm 8/8/19
            • Your last sentence hits it on the head. Those are the most effective things to do. - Frank L - 1:54pm 8/8/19
              • Agree [NT] - CC72 - 2:24pm 8/8/19
          • The 1994 ban stopped certain trademarks and non-lethal features, not mass shootings. [IMAGE] - NedoftheHill - 1:46pm 8/8/19
            • It didn't "stop" mass shootings, but they decreased [LINK] - Chris94 - 1:53pm 8/8/19
              • A reader of your earlier post might've thought you were implying that AW bans reduce mass shootings - NedoftheHill - 2:06pm 8/8/19
                • Mass shootings decreased after the assault-weapons ban - Chris94 - 2:34pm 8/8/19
                  • Crime was down across the board. I don't think the AW ban affected all crime. - NedoftheHill - 8:29pm 8/8/19
            • Yes but that doesn't matter to gun grabbers [NT] - CC72 - 1:49pm 8/8/19
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS