There's a logical fallacy in there somewhere.
As such, Chris can't be far away.
Some people construct ludicrous conspiracy theories about a particular case, therefore any conspiracy theory must thus be invalid.
I think at some point, definitive evidence will emerge that Epstein dealt with several very rich men who themselves dealt in what we now call human trafficking. Do we have examples of criminal kingpins and human trafficking bosses arranging for "hits" on convicts and others? Is that a ludicrous proposition?
Some people construct ludicrous conspiracy theories about a particular case, therefore any conspiracy theory must thus be invalid.
I think at some point, definitive evidence will emerge that Epstein dealt with several very rich men who themselves dealt in what we now call human trafficking. Do we have examples of criminal kingpins and human trafficking bosses arranging for "hits" on convicts and others? Is that a ludicrous proposition?