Sure it is because medical makes the decisions to remove watches.

Frank L 64990 posts Joined: Sep 20, 2007

Posted 8:48 pm on Aug 10, 2019

That’s called negligence and happens routinely. At that point he’s eligible for a regular cell.

Far different than officials doing it for nefarious reasons as part of a conspiracy which at the very least they will be fired for. Also, they don’t make the removal decisions the docs for nuts do that.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies 28

Sure it is because medical makes the decisions to remove watches. Frank L 8:48pm · 8/10/19
- This wasn't Joe Schmo. This is unbelievable and I see Barr and others in the know think the same.NT MAS 10:54pm · 8/10/19
  - Never said it was. You can argue that he should have been held under a stricter standard given his Frank L 11:07pm · 8/10/19
    - My point is that this wasn't a common defendant and I can't recall this ever happening with a... MAS 11:19pm · 8/10/19
      - “Under the circumstances, I would have a staff member sitting there or have a camera on him 24/7...Link MAS 11:33pm · 8/10/19
        
        Cameras are bullshit. They are never monitored properly. The only way is a stripped cell, one one Frank L 11:43pm · 8/10/19
        
        BTW, that article states that the staff psychologist and the warden make the decision.NT MAS 11:45pm · 8/10/19
        
        Normally not the psychologist but the psychiatrist. The Warden has final approval, but normally Frank L 12:02am · 8/11/19
- This wasn't Joe Schmo. This is unbelievable and I see Barr and others in the know think the same.NT MAS 10:54pm · 8/10/19

View Full Conversation