Why do commie Dems want gun manufacturers held liable when a murderer uses their product

CC72 16793 posts Joined: Sep 5, 2010

Posted 12:14 pm on Aug 11, 2019

-1

but they don't wand Ford to be held liable when a scumbag drives his F-250 while drunk and murders a family of 5?

Replies 82

Why do commie Dems want gun manufacturers held liable when a murderer uses their product CC72 12:14pm · 8/11/19
- Because it's political to them. If NRA was PP-like Dem donor/supporter, they would be pro 2nd AmendNT BaronVonZemo 1:25pm · 8/11/19
  - Like Moscow Mitch?NT golfernot 2:04pm · 8/11/19
  - Maybe gov't should fund NRA firearms training. NRA can promise to keep money separate. NedoftheHill 1:28pm · 8/11/19
    - I didn't know that Planned Parenthood was involved in Firearms Training.NT golfernot 4:48pm · 8/11/19
      - You’re operating at about 3 levels below the conversation.NT BaronVonZemo 6:53pm · 8/11/19
        
        Good one. Get that from an Orange tweet?NT golfernot 9:07pm · 8/11/19
      - No firearms necessary to mutilate a baby in the womb. MAS 4:52pm · 8/11/19
- Interesting they trust Trump to take guns away. Maybe they don't actually think Trump is a dictator. NedoftheHill 1:24pm · 8/11/19
  - Your point re hypocrisy:Why doesn't Left see ID for guns as racist, black gun owner suppression? BaronVonZemo 1:29pm · 8/11/19
    - So guns are a black thing.NT golfernot 4:51pm · 8/11/19
      - Must be the case for you. Otherwise, why would you propose a solution which relies on IDs?NT NedoftheHill 5:10pm · 8/11/19
        
        I don't recall proposing a "solution". Please enlighten.NT golfernot 9:02pm · 8/11/19
        
        That's your tact? You are going to dissociate yourself from Dem proposals? Good for you.NT NedoftheHill 9:17pm · 8/11/19
        
        Check out all of his unimaginative [NT] posts in just this thread. Not worth the time. BaronVonZemo 6:17am · 8/12/19
        
        Why wouldn’t it be the same solution for both things for Dems? Hmmmm.NT BaronVonZemo 6:54pm · 8/11/19
    - Indeed. Why do the Dems want to disarm African-Americans by requiring an ID to buy arms. NedoftheHill 1:44pm · 8/11/19
      - I think most Dems would prefer no guns whatsoever. The most interesting point here is... MAS 2:36pm · 8/11/19
        
        You have hit the nail on the head. BaronVonZemo 5:16pm · 8/11/19
- With the same swiftness that views re gay marriage changed, same happening re gun reform.NTLink conorlarkin 1:21pm · 8/11/19
  - All civilizations decay.,, it isn't actually "progressive" at all.. Curly1918 5:46pm · 8/11/19
    - Let’s see pederasty, infanticide, mass murder, and restrictions on guns. Which doesn’t go with the Frank L 5:49pm · 8/11/19
      - None! They are all interconnected deep in the human unconscious. Curly1918 5:57pm · 8/11/19
        
        If you say so.NT Frank L 11:55am · 8/12/19
  - Rights aren't subject to vote. Glad we have a civil rights organization like the NRA protecting us.NT NedoftheHill 1:25pm · 8/11/19
    - Be honest... the NRA suffer from serious castration anxiety... and are terrified of threats... Curly1918 5:49pm · 8/11/19
      - That is a little dramatic. It is more simple than that. NedoftheHill 8:13pm · 8/11/19
    - “civil rights organization.” You understand its purpose, alright.NT Chris94 3:09pm · 8/11/19
      - I always thought a combination of the ACLU & NRA would make the perfrect civil rights organization. NedoftheHill 3:19pm · 8/11/19
        
        Dont worry ACLU absolutism is also alive and well. Take Charlottesville. Frank L 9:58pm · 8/11/19
        
        The NRA was not established to protect rights, Ned. Chris94 3:40pm · 8/11/19
        
        I don't want to embarrass you, Chris, but you are outside your area of expertise on this. NedoftheHill 4:10pm · 8/11/19
        
        You’re simply wrong Chris94 6:02pm · 8/11/19
        
        I respect that you recognize your earlier post is wrong, so you changed. But, you're still wrong. NedoftheHill 8:16pm · 8/11/19
        
        Membership is irrelevant. It is a lobbying org for gun manufacturers.NT Chris94 8:34am · 8/12/19
        Continue 1 reply
        
        It was initially a sportsman’s group. No lobbying and they didn’t give two shits about handguns. Frank L 5:47pm · 8/11/19
        
        And supported several kinds of gun control they oppose today.NT MAS 7:16pm · 8/11/19
        
        Yep. Now it’s essentially a group run by lawyers and lobbyists who take the most extreme positions. Frank L 7:27pm · 8/11/19
        Continue 11 replies
        
        Yep, my father had been a member since his childhood. iairishcheeks 6:14pm · 8/11/19
        
        AR's are the types of guns most protected by the 2nd Amendment. Others are secondary.NT NedoftheHill 8:25pm · 8/11/19
        
        So, he became a communist gun-grabber?NT MAS 7:17pm · 8/11/19
        
        Still have my grand dad’s card from the late 30’s.NT Frank L 6:53pm · 8/11/19
    - Since when is the Second Amendment an unlimited right?NT conorlarkin 2:31pm · 8/11/19
      - You think constitutional rights can be limited based on popularity at any one point in time?!NT BaronVonZemo 7:22pm · 8/11/19
        
        “Popularity” is the wrong term. The Supreme Court has relied on evolving social science. conorlarkin 8:00pm · 8/11/19
        
        Surely you wouldn't use the limit on shouting fire in a theater to limit political speech? NedoftheHill 8:21pm · 8/11/19
        
        Are you seriously equating mass shootings via high capacity firearms with political speech? conorlarkin 8:27pm · 8/11/19
        
        Actually, that is what your side does: equate speech with violence. I'm not doing that. NedoftheHill 9:32pm · 8/11/19
        
        The US Supreme Court decides the boundaries of constitutional rights. conorlarkin 9:50pm · 8/11/19
        Continue 8 replies
      - Hmm. Perhaps since free speech was an unlimited right...and freedom of religion. Why ask me that?NT NedoftheHill 3:17pm · 8/11/19
    - Exception being a woman's right to choose, eh Ned.NT ND521 2:22pm · 8/11/19
      - Conor is curious: Since when has any person's right to choose to act been an unlimited right? NedoftheHill 3:20pm · 8/11/19
    - They are subject to regulation though and the mood in the nation is shifting. There will be more of Frank L 1:56pm · 8/11/19
      - I agree: The nature of gov't is to limit rights, & the gov't has almost infinite attempts to do so. NedoftheHill 2:03pm · 8/11/19
- Struggling to reconcile your 'commie' comment with your bootlicking of a cowardly Russian asset.NT ND521 12:45pm · 8/11/19
  - Guess you are a clueless struggling nitwitNT CC72 3:42pm · 8/11/19
  - Struggling to reconcile your post with the fact that you are doing the Russian's bidding... NedoftheHill 1:49pm · 8/11/19
    - Yeah, right. You should try Deep Breathing for relaxation.NT golfernot 2:08pm · 8/11/19
      - You can't deny that you serve Russia's interests by trying to weaken an elected US president. NedoftheHill 3:23pm · 8/11/19
        
        Orange doesn't need my "help" in serving Russia's interests. golfernot 4:55pm · 8/11/19
        
        And yet, you insist on doing Putie's bidding. Go figure.NT NedoftheHill 5:08pm · 8/11/19
        
        Heh.NT Frank L 5:03pm · 8/11/19
      - I read 'Deep State Breathing', still laughing.NT ND521 2:25pm · 8/11/19

View Full Conversation