Doubt their names have been revealed, but he placed lives at risk.

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Doubt their names have been revealed, but he placed lives at risk.

Author: Frank L (62782 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 10:37 pm on Sep 23, 2019

View All

Even your pal Flynn thinks he has cost American lives or at least he did.

Link: https://www.businessinsider.com/snowdens-cache-of-secrets-likely-means-life-or-death-for-several-people-2013-11

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "Doubt their names have been revealed, but he placed lives at risk."

Let us revisit Edward Snowden. The GOP has now clearly legitimatized Snowden’s conduct. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 9:53pm 9/23/19 (36) [View All]
- Snowden is a hero for uncovering the illegal surveillance [NT] - NDPatrick30 - 2:14am 9/24/19
  - Is he also a hero for selling his stolen info to the Russians? - Chris94 - 11:00am 9/24/19
  - Which means, the recent whistleblower is not a hero because the evidence is against Trump - jimbasil - 2:31am 9/24/19
- I think it is time for Snowden to come home - Chris94 - 10:49pm 9/23/19
- At least Snowden was fighting the Deep State. This "whistleblower" is an agent of the Deep State. - NedoftheHill - 10:08pm 9/23/19
  - He was fighting the deep state by outing and causing the deaths of Americans? You people are off the - Frank L - 10:24pm 9/23/19
    - Who died? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:27pm 9/23/19
      - Doubt their names have been revealed, but he placed lives at risk. [LINK] - Frank L - 10:37pm 9/23/19
        I'm for the rule of law for both, but Snowden at least has a noble cause. - NedoftheHill - 10:39pm 9/23/19
        In your twisted mind maybe. Selling out your country to its enemies isn’t noble. - Frank L - 10:41pm 9/23/19
        I agree that selling out your country to its enemies isn't noble. - NedoftheHill - 10:43pm 9/23/19
        That’s what he did. Whatevs. You guys are all nuts. [NT] - Frank L - 10:44pm 9/23/19
        Funny coming from you. :-) [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:45pm 9/23/19
        I may be but that guy is a fuckin traitor who immeasurably hurt this nation. - Frank L - 10:48pm 9/23/19
        I don't know what he did other than expose the illegal monitoring of US citizens. - NedoftheHill - 10:49pm 9/23/19
        Maybe you should read up on it before espousing his noble motives. - Frank L - 10:51pm 9/23/19
        I wasn't commenting on the other stuff. I was only commenting on the good thing he did. - NedoftheHill - 10:52pm 9/23/19
        The other stuff went hand in hand with it. [NT] - Frank L - 10:54pm 9/23/19
        Don't know what you mean by hand in hand, but regardless, I wasn't commenting on the other stuff. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 11:02pm 9/23/19
        Of course you weren’t. You were trying to justify a traitor. I’m done with this. [NT] - Frank L - 11:23pm 9/23/19
        I think we reached the point of diminishing returns some time ago. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 11:32pm 9/23/19
  - Keep kidding yourself that you believe in the rule of law. - conorlarkin - 10:24pm 9/23/19
    - Funny coming from you. You argue to undermine the rule of law far more than I ever have. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:29pm 9/23/19
      - You think providing excuses for Snowden is upholding the rule of law? [NT] - Frank L - 10:39pm 9/23/19
        No. But, supporting a coup & supporting a million immigration law violations per year is worse. - NedoftheHill - 10:42pm 9/23/19
        So now you are back to Build the Wall. Always a safe place for you. - conorlarkin - 10:57pm 9/23/19
        How about marijuana...should the feds enforce the law? Or, are some people above the law? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:08am 9/24/19
        
        Now you are going to argue against the rule of law?...a million times a year? Predictable. - NedoftheHill - 11:03pm 9/23/19
        Here is the relevant law relevant to this thread — [LINK] - conorlarkin - 11:16pm 9/23/19
        Yes, thanks. I think everyone understands what is going on. - NedoftheHill - 11:19pm 9/23/19
        It is not a criminal statute. “Guilt” is not applicable. [NT] - conorlarkin - 11:30pm 9/23/19
        No high crimes or misdemeanors? That is interesting. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 11:32pm 9/23/19
        I am talking about the statute. You are talking about the substance of the complaint. - conorlarkin - 11:46pm 9/23/19
        I was talking about what you said: no criminal violation. - NedoftheHill - 12:13am 9/24/19
        
        No different than it coming out of yours. [NT] - Frank L - 10:43pm 9/23/19
  - A Trump talking point being fronted once again. Fake News, it's rigged, Fake News [NT] - jimbasil - 10:16pm 9/23/19