I said McCabe will be indicted and I continue to stand by that statement. Silver bracelets for him.

| Register

I said McCabe will be indicted and I continue to stand by that statement. Silver bracelets for him.

Author: Cole (10595 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 1:33 pm on Dec 3, 2019

View All

Meanwhile, you said "Orange Jr." would be indicted before December 25, 2018. Putting the date aside, do you still stand by that statement?

Replies to: "I said McCabe will be indicted and I continue to stand by that statement. Silver bracelets for him."

Barr doesn't agree with IG report - who didn't see that coming? [NT] - jimbasil - 12:36pm 12/3/19 (25) [View All]
- Rather expected given the IG process of allowing targets to rebuttal and negotiate, but..... - BaronVonZemo - 2:23pm 12/3/19
  - Barr, Trump personal attorney and Russian hack. [NT] - jimbasil - 3:14pm 12/3/19
- I assume you respect the NYTimes? If so, why would they print this without evidence? [IMAGE] - Cole - 12:51pm 12/3/19
  - No, with Barr that wouldn’t occur to a reasonable person. - Frank L - 1:28pm 12/3/19
    - I said McCabe will be indicted and I continue to stand by that statement. Silver bracelets for him. - Cole - 1:33pm 12/3/19
      - Okay Seth, you are a credible source. [NT] - Frank L - 2:06pm 12/3/19
        Do you stand by your statement that Orange Jr. will be indicted? [NT] - Cole - 2:11pm 12/3/19
        Not under Barr. [NT] - Frank L - 2:14pm 12/3/19
        Why didn't Mueller indict him? [NT] - Cole - 2:20pm 12/3/19
        And how would I know that? Unlike the Durham lawyers, no one has leaked such info. [NT] - Frank L - 3:17pm 12/3/19
  - Imagine, a Trump hire backs another Trump hire. Who didn't see that coming? [NT] - jimbasil - 1:09pm 12/3/19
    - . [NT] - Frank L - 3:14pm 12/3/19
    - Would you consider Barr to be Trump’s wingman? Where did I hear an AG say that before? Refresh my - PBHangingChad - 1:29pm 12/3/19
      - He is and so was the other clown. They have zero credibility. [NT] - Frank L - 1:31pm 12/3/19
        Absolutely and that’s why elections have consequences. The Dems don’t think they can beat Trump - PBHangingChad - 1:56pm 12/3/19
        No one has accused them of being a bag of brains. Why we have this bozo. - Frank L - 2:01pm 12/3/19
        . [NT] - Frank L - 3:15pm 12/3/19
        
        Do Schiff and/or Nadler have any credibility? [NT] - Cole - 1:34pm 12/3/19
        Do Jordan and Nunes? Please. [NT] - Frank L - 1:46pm 12/3/19
        Re: Do Jordan and Nunes? Please. [LINK] - ChicagoIrish - 3:22pm 12/3/19
        
        Yes, and yes. Now you. Do Nadler and Schiff? [NT] - Cole - 2:12pm 12/3/19
        Yes and yes for impeachment at least. See how this works. - Frank L - 2:16pm 12/3/19
        So Schiff has credibility? Wow, Frank. You might be the only "Republican" to say that. - Cole - 2:38pm 12/3/19
        On impeachment, yes. They will present a credible case to the Senate. [NT] - Frank L - 3:13pm 12/3/19
        And yet, Schiff has been shown to be a liar on the Russia collusion allegations. - NedoftheHill - 12:33pm 2/14/20