Would they have appeared if they were allowed to bring counsel?

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Would they have appeared if they were allowed to bring counsel?

Author: Iggle (12972 Posts - Joined: Sep 14, 2007)

Posted at 9:17 pm on Dec 17, 2019

View All

The world wonders*

*3 UHND points for whomever gets that reference without googling.

Replies to: "Would they have appeared if they were allowed to bring counsel?"

Interesting that Schumer feels like more witnesses are needed, but the House won't call them. - NedoftheHill - 8:25pm 12/17/19 (21) [View All]
- This clown Schumer must be brain dead; FOX has been playing all day excerpts from 1999 - cubsfanin16 - 10:49pm 12/17/19
  - Schumer, Nadler, Bloomberg,Feinstein dual citizenship in Israel.. traitors [NT] - eftg1 - 11:32pm 12/17/19
- Interesting that you didn’t hear that the House called every witness Schumer requested - Chris94 - 8:52pm 12/17/19
  - WH Denied legal representation, GOP denied witnesses and Q's. Secret hearings. Don't insult us - BaronVonZemo - 10:35pm 12/17/19
    - Seriously, you need new news sources. - Chris94 - 10:36pm 12/17/19
      - You know, if you don't know something, it doesn't mean that the other guy is wrong. [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 11:11pm 12/17/19
        He didn’t stop anyone from asking witnesses...wait, what am I doing? - Chris94 - 11:36pm 12/17/19
        He prevented witnesses from answering critical GOP questions. This is irrefutable. - BaronVonZemo - 9:36am 12/18/19
      - Its fair to ask whether you think there is enough testimony to convict right now. Schumer says no. - NedoftheHill - 11:09pm 12/17/19
  - Would they have appeared if they were allowed to bring counsel? - Iggle - 9:17pm 12/17/19
  - Sounds like Ned would welcome material witness warrants in this process. - conorlarkin - 9:01pm 12/17/19
    - You got the impression I thought more witnesses were needed? That is very interesting. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:22pm 12/17/19
      - OK, Mr. Walk Back. [NT] - conorlarkin - 9:25pm 12/17/19
        Maybe when I said "Schumer" you read "Ned?" [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:15pm 12/17/19
- Wrong. The House was not going to reward obstruction and proceed at a slothful pace. - conorlarkin - 8:48pm 12/17/19
  - I don’t know why we need any more witnessing - Chris94 - 10:30pm 12/17/19
    - Sondland's testimony changed, and Ukrainian assistant refutes it. Taylor presumed it from Sondland. - BaronVonZemo - 11:19pm 12/17/19
      - If you are unsatisfied, then let the other witnesses speak [NT] - Chris94 - 8:11am 12/18/19
  - He said Schumer and wisely in the same sentence. That is funny. [NT] - TampaIrish - 10:28pm 12/17/19
  - Trump laid out everything in his letter. Have you read it? :-) [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:23pm 12/17/19
    - No way he made it through all five pages. No way. Anathema to him. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 11:20pm 12/17/19

Consent Management