Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

Fine. 1. Just don't call your decision scientific. 2. We already had a decision -business as usual

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 12:24 pm on Mar 26, 2020
View All

It's called based on null hypothesis. Well, accurately say majority of business as usual, more accurately say at least 80% business should remain as usual. The data from Diamond Princess already told us 80% of her 3,500 people are immune to covid-19, 20% got infected (but 80% of the infected are either have mild symptom or no mild symptom). The rough picture is clear to me, detailed and accurate picture is still not clear though.

BTW, Drug testing is a clinical trial thing (e.g. double blind), it is not a modeling thing


Replies to: "Fine. 1. Just don't call your decision scientific. 2. We already had a decision -business as usual"

  • Inaccurate Virus Models Are Panicking Officials Into Ill-Advised Lockdowns [NT] [LINK] - Eli - 10:44am 3/26/20 (10) [View All]
    • “Madeline Osburn is a staff editor at the Federalist and the producer of The Federalist Radio Hour” - Chris94 - 12:15pm 3/26/20
      • Not interested in the views of mouthpieces on either side. Just want to hear it from the Docs and - Frank L - 1:28pm 3/26/20
    • Believe it or not, data scientists, engineers, epidemiologists, and public health officials - ND_in_DRO - 11:02am 3/26/20
      • I stopped reading at the phrase “Wuhan Virus”. Obviously a political piece. [NT] - Frank L - 11:51am 3/26/20
      • The Imperial College model is not peer-reviewed. [NT] - Eli - 11:03am 3/26/20
        • You have peer-reviewed data that contradicts it? [NT] - ND_in_DRO - 11:22am 3/26/20
          • This is NOT contest. But I won't make policy decision based on un-peer-reviewed, unverified model. [NT] - Eli - 11:28am 3/26/20
            • This pandemic won't wait for a peer-review Eli - ND_in_DRO - 11:47am 3/26/20
              • Fine. 1. Just don't call your decision scientific. 2. We already had a decision -business as usual - Eli - 12:24pm 3/26/20
    • Easily countered with a few Donald lies. "We're doing so great". "We're in great shape". "Because [LINK] - Irish 64 - 10:49am 3/26/20
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS