Apparently you can even "intimate" words that were never previously mentioned and put quotes on them

Thanks Frankx, Ned, and jakers.

Tyrone was caught in a deception once again.

He put quotation marks on the word "rejected" that I never used to imply that I used it in my post while then noting that the very word that he came up with out of thin air cannot even be found in the article that I linked.

Ty wishes to discredit me first because he wants to keep the liberal posters here from having any doubts (that's what I suspect is his expected role here on the Open). Secondly, I badly bruised his ego. He is a Wannabe Expert with no actual expertise. It is sorely apparent, and he resents it when it is pointed out. Note how he chimes in as the expert on almost any topic after doing one of his ridiculous AI tutor sessions.

Ty is quite practiced at his art of deceit. Is it any wonder that I avoid him? I do not find him to be genuine. His thinking is rudimentary and far over-reliant on Google, and now AI. He thinks from his low perch that no one else understands that either of these tools can be turned to emphasize only the result that you want if you ask it properly, and if you omit certain results from your posts.

Thank you again. I expect that Tyrone feels the need to try to counter every post I make at this point given his insecurity and his job. It's too bad that he chooses to be dishonest. Now, like a true liberal, I expect him to accuse me of what he himself is - even when just caught in deceipt.