You are simply waaayyy behind if you are mentioning his peers and other epidemiologists, because they criticized ONLY his article and initial advocacy of HCQ+, not his thorough research paper. As he pointed out in his paper, they referred ONLY to studies that were never conducted properly, which I've spelled out numerous times why they were faulty.

You seem to think a mere layman such as myself can't read what Dr. Risch wrote, can't listen to what Dr. Fareed said, compare that to what your hero the Great Fauchino said, and still comprehend the subject. You would be mistaken. When it comes to whether HCQ+ worked, I can see that ALL credible observational trials showed it worked, every study "discrediting" it wasn't performed properly, and come to the obvious conclusion the medical community didn't use the right logic in saying it didn't work. You don't have to be a medical expert to use basic logic here.