He INITIALLY cited one flawed study in his Newsweek article, for which in his paper he admitted it wasn't valid. However, for the rest of his paper he used ONLY credible data that no one has disputed. Even your hero the Great Fauchino never said the data wasn't accurate; he just didn't accept it due to his flawed personal medical philosophy of not accepting observational trials as valid - again, a philosophy that is NOT shared by the rest of the medical research community. (Shouldn't that in itself at least give you some pause?)

Why you continually get facts wrong and use poor logic on this subject is beyond me. As long as you keep bringing up tired and discredited talking points on this subject and as long as you continue to be wrong, I'm going to correct you, as uncorrectable as you are.